Print

[LessGovernment]

Why does the Pentagon Want 400,000 Military Personnel in U.S.?

Maybe to keep those Tea Party's "civil"?

But NorthCom’s Congressional fact sheet refers not just to a “major disaster” but also to “emergencies.” And it says, “Those terms are defined in section 5122 of title 42, U.S. Code.”

That section gives the President the sole discretion to designate an event as an “emergency” or a “major disaster.” Both are “in the determination of the President” alone.

http://www.progressive.org/node/135305/1680#comment-1680

[SMASH]

 Funny this was done well in advance of the swine flu "pandemic"?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREMEDITATED MERGER
North American Army created without OK by Congress
U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight domestic emergencies

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.

[1conservative]

Funny this was done well in advance of the swine flu "pandemic"?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREMEDITATED MERGER
North American Army created without OK by Congress
U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight domestic emergencies

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.

It's coming boys!

[family man]

There you guys go again, picking and choosing (by bolding out health epidemics) what suits your needs to further push your twisted plots of conspiracies.

What a bunch of pathetic little children you are.

[Baby Hitler]

What a bunch of pathetic little children you are.

If you want to discuss something, then discuss facts, don't attack the poster unless you want to be attacked yourself, which, by the way, is against the TOS.

[SMASH]

Funny this was done well in advance of the swine flu "pandemic"?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREMEDITATED MERGER
North American Army created without OK by Congress
U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight domestic emergencies

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.

There, better?

Happy now, or no?


Some folks just skim over posted material. I just highlighted the part most pertinent to the topic.