Sorry but the "don't like them, don't watch" attitude is much like not liking what Germany was doing in WWII and doing nothing about it. Never said that I don't like them . . . don't have an opinion to be fair. If you must know the place I most enjoy getting news is a hard newspaper - Toledo Blade, (lunch hour at the library) with the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Chicago Sun-Times. I will then follow it up with news on the web if I find a story interesting. I work too many hours to listen to watch TV . . . (although, in the mornings when I am dressing I like "Morning Joe", because of the variety of opinion and (no kidding) the have the best bumper music! !).
By continually pointing out what they are doing, I have been able to convince an EXTREMELY conservative friend of mine that, yes, Fox News does LIE, and does so PURPOSEFULLY.
And as far as your "hate" thing goes, I don't hate individuals, I hate what they do sometimes, and I hate what organizations such as Fox News does to distort and mangle the truth.
As far as my "skills" for gleaning what others so, you evidently "gleaned" that I knew what you meant when you posted before and I asked for clarification, when clearly I did not understand what you meant.
Perhaps you should examine your own "gleaning" skills?
Did you really just compare and attitude on a news organization to the atrocities committed in WWII . . . dude . . . such extreme comparisons are, IMHO, silly and do not forward your argument.
Wonderful that you have helped someone expand the the base from which they find and utilize information.
Just telling you the way it comes across IMO . . . as these "errors", "mistakes", "sin's of omission" are only pointed out and screamed one way. In terms of "hate" . . . I used that only because you agreed you feel that way. You can qualify it all you like but once you begin to feel such a powerful, visceral feeling about another entity (person, place, thing . . . blah, blah, blah) then you allow such darkness to infect your future impressions of anyone that is connected to that entity. That to me is very sad as it purposefully pushes other thoughts, feelings and opinions away and makes them somehow less than when this is never the case. But . . . that's just me.
My word man, . . . you continue to harp on someone "defending" when I have already agreed with you that they were "wrong". Hell, in the instance that began this exchange, they admitted they were wrong (yes, I get that you find the admission somewhat "lesser than" but . . . they did admit it). Again - your hatred of them is scary and honestly when you extend it to what you believe others are doing it is strikingly odd and to be frank - raises concerns. It's no longer about exchange of ideals or opinions it about "I am right" and you are "your wrong" . . . which can NEVER be true all the time. What was is it . . . even a broken clock is correct twice a day?
You are correct. I did believe that you had figured out that "be" was suppose to be "we" and as you have stated you did not . . . I apologize for believing otherwise and will work to ensure in the future that I not make a determination on your skills.