MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Politics and Government > Newt


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Newt  (Read 3069 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SMASH

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4558
Re: Newt
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2011, 04:45:17 PM »
Now even Newt has to steal Ron Paul's ideas!!

Gingrich calls for private retirement accounts

http://news.yahoo.com/gingrich-calls-private-retirement-accounts-140950969.html
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Newt
« Reply #31 on: November 22, 2011, 10:27:42 PM »
There was another debate tonight...

I especially enjoyed this comment...

"FAST FOOD REPUBLICANS
Submitted by XXXXX on Tue, 11/22/2011 - 22:36.

Gingrich is pure stupidity. He's a serial adulterer who served his terminally ill wife with divorce papers and appeared with Pelosi in and ad promoting an awareness of Global Warming. He supported an individual mandate on health care.

What is wrong with the Republican party? Are they really that stupid? Must we continually refer to Newt as "Speaker" when he was disgraced with a censure for ethics problems???? REALLY?"

link...

http://www.dailypaul.com/188575/november-22-2011-cnn-republican-national-security-debate-8pm-et
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

Flanders

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Newt
« Reply #32 on: November 22, 2011, 11:00:26 PM »
Ron Paul.. lol.
Logged

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1482
Re: Newt
« Reply #33 on: November 23, 2011, 01:17:41 AM »
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

TheSeeker

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 401
Re: Newt
« Reply #34 on: November 23, 2011, 02:59:37 PM »
Quote from: ussoccer26 on November 23, 2011, 01:17:41 AM
Newt vs Paul on the subject of the patriot act.

http://cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2011/11/22/gop-debate-patriot-act.cnn

I agree with Paul. What are you willing to give up for a degree of safety? Wish Paul hadn't used McVeigh to argue his point though.   :P
Logged
Anaconda don't want none, unless you got butt hun.

SMASH

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4558
Re: Newt
« Reply #35 on: November 23, 2011, 07:24:25 PM »
Quote from: TheSeeker on November 23, 2011, 02:59:37 PM
I agree with Paul. What are you willing to give up for a degree of safety? Wish Paul hadn't used McVeigh to argue his point though.   :P
[/quote/]

I wonder what ever became of McVeigh's handlers?
Probably got promoted and work for Homeland Security!
Logged

SMASH

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4558
Re: Newt
« Reply #36 on: November 30, 2011, 02:52:18 PM »
Quote from: TheSeeker on November 23, 2011, 02:59:37 PM
I agree with Paul. What are you willing to give up for a degree of safety? Wish Paul hadn't used McVeigh to argue his point though.   :P
McVeigh is dead and this is the kind of stuff Newt and the boys at Bilderburg
LOVE today. Wonder if they think this stuff up while they are hanging out at the Grove?

Fusion Center documents label OKC Bombing investigators as terrorists

OKLAHOMA CITY – Ten years after 9/11 and 16 years after the Oklahoma City bombing, it appears the federal government continues to view some Americans who embrace their First Amendment rights – press and speech, primarily – as a danger to the State, and as a result they are listing certain investigative websites as extremist and a terroristic threat to the “homeland.”

http://reddirtreport.com/Story.aspx/20516

Is this conquest or consent?

Sure looks like consent to me.
Logged

SMASH

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4558
Re: Newt
« Reply #37 on: December 01, 2011, 11:30:21 AM »
Logged

lordfly

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7567
  • Fancy.
Re: Newt
« Reply #38 on: December 01, 2011, 08:26:08 PM »
Quote from: Flanders on November 22, 2011, 11:00:26 PM
Ron Paul.. lol.

My thoughts exactly. The well-meaning but ultimately crazy Uncle who stuffs his mattress with gold.

Logged
your mom goes to college.

Flanders

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Newt
« Reply #39 on: December 01, 2011, 08:33:52 PM »
Quote from: lordfly on December 01, 2011, 08:26:08 PM
My thoughts exactly. The well-meaning but ultimately crazy Uncle who stuffs his mattress with gold.



yup.  I feel the guy's passion, and his ideas sound interesting in theory, but still.. lol.


And to the topic of Newt.  I think I just saw a Rasmussen poll showing Nationwide Newt 38% and Mitt 17%.
Logged

lordfly

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7567
  • Fancy.
Re: Newt
« Reply #40 on: December 01, 2011, 08:46:32 PM »
Quote from: Flanders on December 01, 2011, 08:33:52 PM
yup.  I feel the guy's passion, and his ideas sound interesting in theory, but still.. lol.


And to the topic of Newt.  I think I just saw a Rasmussen poll showing Nationwide Newt 38% and Mitt 17%.

I'm amused. The tea party is theoretically VERY antiestablishment, but they are currently throwing their support behind one of the most establishment candidates out there, one who, might I add, can't possibly go after the morality vote with a straight face.

He might be a smart guy but he's political suicide. That and he's pretty much the physical embodiment of Beltway Politics (ie more of the same).

Good game, Republicans, good game. Democrats will have an absolute field day with his infidelity, his tantrums in Congress, his responsibility for the government shutdown, and so on.

Then again, this could be just another blip in the "anyone but Romney" circle. First Bachmann, then Perry, then Cain, now Gingrich. About the only folks left in that parade are Huntsman (Ew! He talked to Obama sometimes! SOCIALIST KENYAN!) and Ron Paul (Uncle, mattress, etc).

The conservative politics in this country astound me. At least get an electable dictator, not these nincompoops.


Logged
your mom goes to college.

Flanders

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Newt
« Reply #41 on: December 01, 2011, 09:09:45 PM »
Quote from: lordfly on December 01, 2011, 08:46:32 PM
I'm amused. The tea party is theoretically VERY antiestablishment, but they are currently throwing their support behind one of the most establishment candidates out there, one who, might I add, can't possibly go after the morality vote with a straight face.

He might be a smart guy but he's political suicide. That and he's pretty much the physical embodiment of Beltway Politics (ie more of the same).

Good game, Republicans, good game. Democrats will have an absolute field day with his infidelity, his tantrums in Congress, his responsibility for the government shutdown, and so on.

Then again, this could be just another blip in the "anyone but Romney" circle. First Bachmann, then Perry, then Cain, now Gingrich. About the only folks left in that parade are Huntsman (Ew! He talked to Obama sometimes! SOCIALIST KENYAN!) and Ron Paul (Uncle, mattress, etc).


The conservative politics in this country astound me. At least get an electable dictator, not these nincompoops.




Bachmann... God I can't stand hearing her talk, especially when wishing Elvis a happy birthday.

Perry...  Seems to be W 2.0, oops.

Cain...  Next female to accuse cain  of anything will be promptly pimp slapped. Apart from that, seems likeable enough.  But unless a question can be answered with 999, not a lot going for him.

Huntsman/Santorum... Who are they?  Is that the guy with the kids?

Mitt...  The just settle for me candidate.

Newt... Perhaps being in the white house will earn him enough XP for another wifely upgrade.

RonPaul.. Yup, uncle, mattress, and suit three sizes too big.

However, I am excited to see the Newt vs Mitt lovefest play out.  The gloves have to come off eventually and the destruction left will make room for my man Rudy to step in and save the day.
Logged

lordfly

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7567
  • Fancy.
Re: Newt
« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2011, 09:40:15 PM »
Rudy "9/11 9/11 did I mention 9/11" Guilani is just a Hitler affecionado with a security consulting company (more fan of fascism, not an actual skinhead). He gives me the heeby jeebies.
Logged
your mom goes to college.

John Kopke

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4425
Re: Newt
« Reply #43 on: December 01, 2011, 10:48:11 PM »
OK. Most of topic negative on Newt. So let me ask you this. Would we be better off electing Obama for another term or would we be better off with Newt? That could very well be the choice. Who will better "lead" us into a brighter future?
Logged
John Kopke

lordfly

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7567
  • Fancy.
Re: Newt
« Reply #44 on: December 02, 2011, 12:43:46 AM »
Quote from: John Kopke on December 01, 2011, 10:48:11 PM
OK. Most of topic negative on Newt. So let me ask you this. Would we be better off electing Obama for another term or would we be better off with Newt? That could very well be the choice. Who will better "lead" us into a brighter future?

One is a vote for herpes, one is a vote for syphilis.

choices, choices.
Logged
your mom goes to college.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »