MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Politics and Government > Why not Ron Paul, exactly?


Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 31   Go Down

Author Topic: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?  (Read 13458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #390 on: April 29, 2012, 08:46:11 AM »

I will continue to do this until you guys stop using the Ron Paul topic as your personal gladiator arena.  :)
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #391 on: April 29, 2012, 08:47:25 AM »

I will continue to do this until you guys stop using the Ron Paul topic as your personal gladiator arena.  :)
LOL nice. :D
Logged

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #392 on: April 29, 2012, 08:57:44 AM »

;)
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #393 on: April 29, 2012, 09:14:44 AM »

Okay, one more. Sorry but I actually find this one funny.


Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

LetsGoWings

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #394 on: April 29, 2012, 11:41:16 AM »

Looks like you failed to keep your promises too.
I have tried to keep it civil, but even after that you attacked first yet again. I pulled up some of your firsts posts here as FB and they all started off rude, you start a lot of stuff here. Again if you never commented about the photo then none of this would have happened, how do you not see this?

It is amazing you said those PMs were impossible, but I just posted a bunch of them. Wrong yet again. It is truly amazing how often you are wrong.

So it it OK to make fun of syndromes now? And you never admit you were wrong either, and if I do prove you wrong you just start complaining and say I am nitpicking and never actually admit you were wrong.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 11:54:05 AM by LetsGoWings »
Logged
Great advice from another poster on this forum, we should all live by this:

"I'd advise against anyone contemplating sullying the reputation of any of the candidates without solid proof. "

Frenchfry

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 27230
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #395 on: May 01, 2012, 11:36:37 AM »

Here is part of the Admins PM to me:
Hey, we don't make a habit of thanking users, but I wanted to send you a quick note thanking you for the advice you gave to Fluffy.  We couldn't have said it any better ourselves.   
We appreciate the assistance, I'm glad someone else recognized what his motives were.

Thanks for proving my assertion about the obvious bias of the moderators.
I can't count the number of times I've requested information about my name being posted on the forum and it seems short of a court order, they just won't reply. Perhaps they're complicit.
Quote

    LGW:
    Appreciate your going after Fluffy when he trashed me.



Quote

    Just keep giving it to FB, I love it, that made my day.
    THANK YOU



Quote

    Hey, we don't make a habit of thanking users, but I wanted to send you a quick note thanking you for the advice you gave to Fluffy.  We couldn't have said it any better ourselves.  We appreciate the assistance, I'm glad someone else recognized what his motives were.

Quote

    Thanks!  I took no offense. ******* are just such big targets these days that I make a point of presenting an alternative view.  Carry on.

****** were given hide the user, they have a rare profession and it would have given them away. I apologized prior to this one because a post was taken out of context.

Here is one from you, but you failed to live up to it:
Quote

    Just to let you know, I removed you from my ignore list. I look forward to discussing topics with you in the future, even if we might not be on the same side.


Quote

    Thank you. I don't think you were rude towards me but rather you were trying to drive a point home. If I was rude towards you than I apologize as well.

Another PM from a use I apologized to.


Care to explain how I alienate people again? I have a lot more of these too, so I can keep going.
Bolstered by the Personal Message cheerleaders??
I guess some people are easily swayed.  8*
But again thanks for proving what's happening behind the scenes.
Logged
WARNING! Reading Republican/Conservative/Tea Party comments will lower your intelligence quotient!

The new motto of the obstructionist Republican Party/Conservative-right/Tea Party...refuse to legislate, just investigate.

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #396 on: May 04, 2012, 10:23:43 AM »

Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

T-M-T

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3951
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #397 on: May 04, 2012, 11:18:24 AM »

it's NOT over....



Yes it is.  You just happened to find one Ron Paul slappy in the media to tell you what you want to hear.

Ron Paul clearly has thousands of loyal, enthusiastic supporters.  Unfortunately, Ronmey’s not-as-vocal, not-as-enthusiastic supporters outnumber them by about five to one.
Logged

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8663
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #398 on: May 04, 2012, 11:34:30 AM »

Randall Terry, born 1959, pro-life activist and founder of Operation Rescue from West Virginia. In January 2011, Terry announced his intention to challenge President Barack Obama in the Democratic Party primaries for the presidential election of 2012.[17][18][19] He intended to run an ad featuring graphic photos of aborted fetuses during Super Bowl XLVI in February 2012.[20][21][22] He has qualified for ballot status in the New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Missouri primaries. He has received 22,734 votes as of March 10th, and has qualified for seven delegates in the Oklahoma Primary,[14] where he bested Obama in the vote total in several counties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2012


BROKERED PRIMARY!   This guy (whoever the heck he is has all the answers (whatever they are) and is the only one with all the answers to save us all!
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8663
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #399 on: May 04, 2012, 11:38:51 AM »

John Wolfe, Jr., attorney and perennial political candidate, from Tennessee. Wolfe declared his candidacy in late 2011.[23] He has qualified for ballot status in at least four primaries. In the Louisiana primary, he won a minimum of three delegates.[24]  same source. 

Maybe this goober is the better choice for a BROKERED CONVENTION!  He is listed as a perennial like Paul is, doesn't persistence make him the godly choice to save us all from everything?
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8663
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #400 on: May 04, 2012, 11:41:48 AM »

Okay, so I apologize for making fun of the situation.  It is difficult to understand such deep and fanatical commitment to a single person.  I was not trying to make fun of any individual, even Paul.
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #401 on: May 04, 2012, 01:24:24 PM »

Well, that is a very convenient argument you keep making T-M-T; tied directly to your communist leanings that might-makes-right....too bad the 3% that agreed with our founders didn't quit like you propose we do; otherwise your organizations that threaten politiicians who dare to do right at the recommendation of Godly Christians who want the lies that support your vain philosophies that hurt American schoolchildren via our textbooks would have never been afforded an opportunity to exist.

Only a closed environment of intimidation and cronyism keeps you and your clowns entrenched in political power today....good luck with that; righteousness has always had a victorious Advocate!  Your side has never been able to dethrone.  We need not "numbers" as you so wrongly assert, only the confidence to do what is right.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2012, 01:34:59 PM by LessGovernment »
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8663
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #402 on: May 04, 2012, 02:00:07 PM »

Well, that is a very convenient argument you keep making T-M-T; tied directly to your communist leanings that might-makes-right....too bad the 3% that agreed with our founders didn't quit like you propose we do; otherwise your organizations that threaten politiicians who dare to do right at the recommendation of Godly Christians who want the lies that support your vain philosophies that hurt American schoolchildren via our textbooks would have never been afforded an opportunity to exist.

Only a closed environment of intimidation and cronyism keeps you and your clowns entrenched in political power today....good luck with that; righteousness has always had a victorious Advocate!  Your side has never been able to dethrone.  We need not "numbers" as you so wrongly assert, only the confidence to do what is right.

Wow, I love it.  "You are wrong and we are right.  Your wrongheaded ideas must die and only ours taught."  Funny, nothing at all is stopping you from believing or teaching whatever the heck you want.  But, your supposed Christianity has no room for anything but your HUMAN dogma.


So, EXACTLY what "lies" are you referring?  Did you know that 2000 years ago a tallest person was only 5'7" or about.  All people were short compared to us.  Why is it, in your creationist explanation, that God personally made each generation taller?  There is nothing in any Bible that I have read that explains atomic theories, or gravitation, or atmospheric pressure.  Where in the Bible does it say that anyone that understands science is Satan's minion?  Where in the Bible, Less, does it command that people shut off their minds to thinking?

Have no clue of any kind what the ranting about 3% is supposed to be about.
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #403 on: May 04, 2012, 09:06:24 PM »


Yes it is.  You just happened to find one Ron Paul slappy in the media to tell you what you want to hear.

Ron Paul clearly has thousands of loyal, enthusiastic supporters.  Unfortunately, Ronmey’s not-as-vocal, not-as-enthusiastic supporters outnumber them by about five to one.


It's not over. Even fox news stated on their website that RP has a real shot. Do you even know how the Republican primaries work or are you just insistent on fanning the flames of trolling?
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1481
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #404 on: May 04, 2012, 09:10:08 PM »

Okay, so I apologize for making fun of the situation.  It is difficult to understand such deep and fanatical commitment to a single person.  I was not trying to make fun of any individual, even Paul.

I'm not committed to Ron Paul. I'm committed to the platform that RP is running on, it just so happens RP is leading the charge! When Dr. Paul retires I shall find someone else who furthers the same cause.
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 31   Go Up