MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Politics and Government > Why not Ron Paul, exactly?


Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 31   Go Down

Author Topic: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?  (Read 13513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LetsGoWings

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #360 on: April 27, 2012, 03:57:37 PM »

Sorry, did I hit you below the belt? I was commenting on his picture, if you don't like it, get bent.
Why is it so difficult for you to provide something relevant to the subject instead of being rude all the time?
Logged
Great advice from another poster on this forum, we should all live by this:

"I'd advise against anyone contemplating sullying the reputation of any of the candidates without solid proof. "

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #361 on: April 27, 2012, 08:45:25 PM »

Accuracy is always important in matters like these...all we get is conjecture from Ron Paul "the sky will fall if he wins" camp, which is based on an emotional bias that causes them to cut-and-paste from MSM articles where, to this day, ridicule is not often the test of truth.

The fact of the matter is that a small percentage of Americans are trying to SAVE this country for everybody else, not our selfish-selves...and what people will come to appreciate is that we studied their rulebook, got in their face, and have upset them to the degree that they have been forced to commit blatent act of fraud, misrepresentations, intimidation, and vote-rigging via rule changes and playing legalese games with novices to our political system in order to maintain power and the status quo.

And so, if anyone thinks Ron Paul and his followers are irrelevant; read here...we're in this to to win this ... or die trying ...
http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/ron-pauls-delegate-math-an-accurate-update/

NOTE: The games still continue ... the GOP at large doesn't want Constitutional conservatives or any grounded persons of character in high elected office if they approach government in the same manner our founders would(small government; God is higher than Caesar - sinful man cannot be trusted - separation of powers, checks and balances - not YOURS to give etc.).  The Conservative Caucus of Monroe County had this brief battle with Richardville and his machine back in the day when I lived there ... when I saw what I would be up against after deciding to run for Ebli's seat in 2008, I just skipped going through a primary battle and decided to run 3rd party so I would be on the ballot in hopes that some more conservatives would wise up.

from the blog...
"Which brings me to one more correction.  The International Business Times claims that Ron Paul will win a majority of the delegates from North Dakota.  Nada.  That will not happen.  In fact, that process is done and it is one of the states where the Ron Paul people were ambushed by Romney’s Goldman Sachs brigade.  While  Ron Paul beat Mitt Romney, who came in third place in the North Dakota state vote, Romney still won 60% of the delegation at the state convention by a combination of lawyers, parliamentarians, the elimination of paper ballots and controlling the audio visuals."

Since this is also how guys like Richardville also maintain their political careers today(via cronyism), I would dare say the electorate at large is now quite aware how rampant it is in our system.  And now that they have seen it all over the internet because of the Ron Paul supporters who have courageously exposed it, I would also say that even if Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination - these people's days are numbered because we're not going anywhere - we have more energy, determination, understanding, purpose, vision, and fight in us than they will ever have...just like our founders...lost many battles, but won the war!
« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 08:53:07 PM by LessGovernment »
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 2492
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #362 on: April 27, 2012, 09:16:27 PM »

And just how long has Ron Paul, "the outsider", " the one who never votes for PORK for his district"(wink wink), been in office? Ya gotta love the underdogs; they never give up, and never stop whining.
Logged

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8677
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #363 on: April 27, 2012, 09:40:31 PM »

Accuracy is always important in matters like these...all we get is conjecture from Ron Paul "the sky will fall if he wins" camp, which is based on an emotional bias that causes them to cut-and-paste from MSM articles where, to this day, ridicule is not often the test of truth.

The fact of the matter is that a small percentage of Americans are trying to SAVE this country for everybody else, not our selfish-selves...and what people will come to appreciate is that we studied their rulebook, got in their face, and have upset them to the degree that they have been forced to commit blatent act of fraud, misrepresentations, intimidation, and vote-rigging via rule changes and playing legalese games with novices to our political system in order to maintain power and the status quo.

And so, if anyone thinks Ron Paul and his followers are irrelevant; read here...we're in this to to win this ... or die trying ...
http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/ron-pauls-delegate-math-an-accurate-update/

NOTE: The games still continue ... the GOP at large doesn't want Constitutional conservatives or any grounded persons of character in high elected office if they approach government in the same manner our founders would(small government; God is higher than Caesar - sinful man cannot be trusted - separation of powers, checks and balances - not YOURS to give etc.).  The Conservative Caucus of Monroe County had this brief battle with Richardville and his machine back in the day when I lived there ... when I saw what I would be up against after deciding to run for Ebli's seat in 2008, I just skipped going through a primary battle and decided to run 3rd party so I would be on the ballot in hopes that some more conservatives would wise up.

from the blog...
"Which brings me to one more correction.  The International Business Times claims that Ron Paul will win a majority of the delegates from North Dakota.  Nada.  That will not happen.  In fact, that process is done and it is one of the states where the Ron Paul people were ambushed by Romney’s Goldman Sachs brigade.  While  Ron Paul beat Mitt Romney, who came in third place in the North Dakota state vote, Romney still won 60% of the delegation at the state convention by a combination of lawyers, parliamentarians, the elimination of paper ballots and controlling the audio visuals."

Since this is also how guys like Richardville also maintain their political careers today(via cronyism), I would dare say the electorate at large is now quite aware how rampant it is in our system.  And now that they have seen it all over the internet because of the Ron Paul supporters who have courageously exposed it, I would also say that even if Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination - these people's days are numbered because we're not going anywhere - we have more energy, determination, understanding, purpose, vision, and fight in us than they will ever have...just like our founders...lost many battles, but won the war!

You do realize that you are criticizing Rmoney with a negative for exactly what Paul is bragging up that he is doing?  Din't know that there were so many ways to buy a candidate and get away with it. 
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

Professor H

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6931
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #364 on: April 27, 2012, 11:09:09 PM »

LoL  another blog being passed off as facts... 

Can't argue with Opinions...   everyone has one.
Logged
First, it was not a strip bar, it was an erotic club. And second, what can I say? I'm a night owl.
Marion Berry

But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.
Nancy Pelosi

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #365 on: April 28, 2012, 01:10:54 AM »

Why is it so difficult for you to provide something relevant to the subject instead of being rude all the time?
I'm not rude all the time, therefore you are incorrect.
Logged

LetsGoWings

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #366 on: April 28, 2012, 03:54:47 AM »

I'm not rude all the time, therefore you are incorrect.
Prove you are not.

Sorry I have proved you wrong so much lately.
Logged
Great advice from another poster on this forum, we should all live by this:

"I'd advise against anyone contemplating sullying the reputation of any of the candidates without solid proof. "

Professor H

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6931
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #367 on: April 28, 2012, 08:52:58 AM »

Now Now - If I can learn to be cordial with my supposed arch poster -
you two can learn and do the same  ;D

This post has taught us the idiosyncrasies of the primary system -
That two people can look at the same data and see something completely different
That blogs influence
That some candidates have faithful followers who will follow them to the end
That open discussion on a topic can be a learning experience for all
Logged
First, it was not a strip bar, it was an erotic club. And second, what can I say? I'm a night owl.
Marion Berry

But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.
Nancy Pelosi

ussoccer26

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1482
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #368 on: April 28, 2012, 10:01:16 AM »

Now Now - If I can learn to be cordial with my supposed arch poster -
you two can learn and do the same  ;D

This post has taught us the idiosyncrasies of the primary system -
That two people can look at the same data and see something completely different
That blogs influence
That some candidates have faithful followers who will follow them to the end
That open discussion on a topic can be a learning experience for all


Pretty much sums it up.
Logged
Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #369 on: April 28, 2012, 10:16:07 AM »

Prove you are not.
In my last post and in this post, I am not being rude, therefore I am not rude ALL the time.

Therefore you are wrong.

Have a nice day. :D
Logged

ducksoup

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8677
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #370 on: April 28, 2012, 01:19:44 PM »

I still would like to hear why this guy deserves the adoration and devotion not given to many rock stars or sport super heroes.

Also want a reasoning of why he is promoted for his libertarian stance and not running as a Libertarian.
Logged
After one taste, you'll duck soup the rest of your life ... Groucho Marx.

LetsGoWings

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #371 on: April 28, 2012, 02:45:11 PM »

In my last post and in this post, I am not being rude, therefore I am not rude ALL the time.

Therefore you are wrong.

Have a nice day. :D
I feel you are rude all the time, and that you were rude in your last post. Therefore you are wrong. Have a nice day.
Logged
Great advice from another poster on this forum, we should all live by this:

"I'd advise against anyone contemplating sullying the reputation of any of the candidates without solid proof. "

SMASH

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4558
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #372 on: April 28, 2012, 02:46:38 PM »

I still would like to hear why this guy deserves the adoration and devotion not given to many rock stars or sport super heroes.

Also want a reasoning of why he is promoted for his libertarian stance and not running as a Libertarian.

If today's Republicans knew their own history and foundation they would realize Ron Paul is a Republican, and they aren't.

Logged

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #373 on: April 28, 2012, 05:33:34 PM »

i feel that you are not only rude but obnoxious and lack any sense of humor. Good day.
Logged

LetsGoWings

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Why not Ron Paul, exactly?
« Reply #374 on: April 28, 2012, 05:38:15 PM »

i feel that you are not only rude but obnoxious and lack any sense of humor. Good day.
The exact same can be said for you. You obviously took a jab, and went off topic, when you mentioned about having a fit, but you flipped out when I also put my pictures in the signature area.
Logged
Great advice from another poster on this forum, we should all live by this:

"I'd advise against anyone contemplating sullying the reputation of any of the candidates without solid proof. "
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 31   Go Up