This is what you quoted Sybil....yourself!
You may have interpreted his post to mean that...but he did NOT say that.
And note what smash said again:He already answered you JBS.
Hey JBS....do you agree with the drug war? Would you call it a success?
I didn't SAY anything Fry. You can cut and paste the quotes into any order you want, I aksed a question, like I said... you drew the conclusions and assigned them to the players.
And no fry I think the war on drugs is a horrible failure and I think officers would rather spend their time preventing real crime, like break-ins, assaults and the like. They would have the time to do this and an adequate presence if they didn't have to bust every dope holding some dope.
NOW TO CLARIFY:
And this is actually going to take some reading on your part....
Absolutely correct PAX, only the president can terminate the 1933 "National Emergency" that subjects United States citizens to the same powers we use against the "enemy" during times of war.
Paul will terminate the Trading With the Enemy Act as amended of March 9th 1933, this is why the establishment is wetting themselves.
This is seriously your guys's most pressing concern, the symbolic termination of an 80 year old law that isn't really enforced anymore?
How much weed, exactly, and laced with what, do you guys need to smoke for any of this to make sense?
Ever heard of thee "War on Drugs"?
Where does the authority come from to perpetuate this War within the boarders of the US on the American People?
So people who abuse street drugs are enemy combatants of the state in your eyes?
NOTE THE FRIGGIN QUESTION MARK..............
That's the government's position bub, not mine.
SMASH states that his belief is that the government views drug users and dealers as enemy combatants.
JBS interpreted some comments wrong again.
Well I'm not surprised.
LOGIC FAIL!!!! I never interpreted a thing, simply asked a question. It is that whole reading comprehension thing rearing its ugly head again.
As usual... you are wrong again. He even admits his stance is that the government views drug users and dealers as enemy combatants. He just didn't tell us how he drew that conclusion. All I did was ask a question, didn't interpret a damn thing. But anyway I know copy/paste is your strong suit... not reading comprehension so I forgive your gaff.
HE didn't say that...YOU said that.
What the h*ll do you people smoke anyway?
It seems like you righties rarely miss an opportunity to twist and distort.
I assume smash meant borders but even taking the word boarders literally wouldn't be enough to misconstrue his post.
Ahh you assumed and thus we found the root of the problem. You went out there and thought on your own.
So where Fry? Where in that did I SAY the government feels drug dealers and users are enemy combatants of the government? Don't wast your time I didn't.
You got so wrapped up in trying to make me look foolish that you got crossed up yourself. Then you cut up the quotes in order to try and save face.
As usual the conversation means nothing to you, just the argument over words and the chance to eventually name call which I am sure is close to being right around the corner. But of course this is what always happens when you try to think on your own.
Go home puppy.