What a load of BS duck. Twist in the wind a bit more. I never told anyone to shut the **** up as you suggest. I simply think the media attention to this is overblown and led to a whole bunch of emotional demands that the desire for Zim to be punished overrides the process of the Laws of the State of Florida. If the media really wanted investigation they could have easily just taken their concerns to the Feds quietly insted of getting everyone all lathered up, especially people like you who have no real touch on the reality of the case only the emotional crap the media and great Americans like Al Sharpton have fed you. The media Sharpton and the people who he has twisted in an emotional tizzy (people like yourself) have no intention of wantoing a REAL investigation, you want street justice on your terms. Then... on to the next overblow incident that will allow you to be on the right side of cultural desires.
And again you cited nothing. Your posts was intended only to try and start another war with me... and it was blatantly false and misleading. Good Day!
Well, I thought I was being nice by not quoting again after Fluffy pointed it out already WITH A DIRECT QUOTE.
As for my characterization that you are saying STFU, maybe it is an exaggeration, but not a distortion. You did the exact same thing again in that response. You claim that the media and posters here are being emotional and should shut up and let the law do its thing (now that there IS an investigation). I don’t know if some have called for “punishment” rather than “justice” but suppose it is possible.
The media wants you to watch their advertising, not silently advance legal issues behind the scenes. I can safely say that I have not read anything by Sharpton as you accuse. I admit, however, that everything I have know about it has been through the media, because I was not there. I further have to make a wild guess that you were not there either and coincidentally have gotten your information through that same - oh, so horrible, media.
The media Sharpton and the people who he has twisted in an emotional tizzy (people like yourself) have no intention of wantoing a REAL investigation, you want street justice on your terms
Cite it. I have repeatedly stated that he was not going to be charged and the media attention has reopened the case and now there is an investigation. I find it an interesting case, and personally believe that he will not be charged. That is not emotional, just my opinion. I have not even once “demanded” that Zimmerman be punished. As far as accusing me of wanting to lynch him rather than want the legal system to work... prove it, cite it. I can show where I have said I WANT the legal system to work and not be preemptively stopped on the night of the incident because he claimed SYG.
Now, I do have problems with the law SYG, but that is not the discussion, as it seems that posters are nit-picking what the media said or didn’t say that this person or that did or didn’t say seems far more important.
insted of getting everyone all lathered up, especially people like you who have no real touch on the reality of the case only the emotional crap the media and great Americans like Al Sharpton have fed you.
Cite that too. I believe I have not been emotional, and especially have not reflected “people like you who have no real touch on the reality of the case”. Cite where I have regurgitated what Al Sharpton has said, whatever that is, and just how you know what I think, without having said anything of the kind.
posts was intended only to try and start another war with me... and it was blatantly false and misleading.
You made a statement that the media should stay out and the law would handle it. All I did was explain that it had. The investigation was OVER, you had what you wanted, the law said no investigation. The media, that you decry, simply got the case opened to actually really be investigated. I can agree that speaking simply about a legal case the media is NOW overdoing it. But, that is how the media works to make them money. That is not false, nor is it “blatantly false”. I will accept that referring to you saying STFU was an exaggeration; it was not “misleading”.