> Categories > People > Tear Down Fermi!

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Down

Author Topic: Tear Down Fermi!  (Read 8397 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9218
Re: Tear Down Fermi!
« Reply #90 on: July 13, 2012, 11:24:03 PM »

June 28, 2012
This preliminary notification constitutes EARLY notice of events of POSSIBLE safety or public
interest significance. Some of the information may not yet be fully verified or evaluated and is
basically all that is known by the Region III staff on this date.
Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2
Detroit Edison Company
Monroe, MI
Docket: 50-341
On June 25, 2012, at 1330 (EDT), during power ascension following repairs to the main
transformer cooling oil pumps, operators of the Unit 2 reactor at the Fermi Power Plant manually
scrammed the reactor. Operators scrammed the reactor at approximately 24 percent power
due to the loss of one reactor feed pump because of high vibrations. The other reactor feed
pump was not in service at the time. All control rods inserted and all plant systems responded
normally to the scram. The NRC resident inspectors were onsite at the time and responded to
the notification of the scram.
On June 26, 2012, at 0521 (EDT), the licensee entered cold shutdown (Mode 4). The licensee
is continuing to investigate the cause of the high vibrations on the reactor feed pump and the
subsequent damage to the pump that was identified following the shutdown of the reactor. The
NRC resident inspectors continue to follow the issue.
This preliminary notification is issued for information only.
Region III received initial notification of this occurrence by a telephone call from the resident
inspector’s office (RIO) at approximately 1400 (EDT) on June 25, 2012 (refer to Event
Notification No. 48047).

Health Monitoring of Rotating
Equipment from Torsional
Vibration Features

Martin W. Trethewey

Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering
Penn State University

April 13, 2007

BWR Recirculation Pumps

• NRC Information Note 2005-08
– April 2005

Many Byron Jackson (now Flowserve) RRP shafts have been inspected

– ALL have some thermal cracking at thermal barrier
– Axial cracks
– Generally benign

Dangerous Circumferential Cracks

– Axial thermal cracks change direction under mechanical loading
– Fast growing
– Can cause catastrophic shaft failure

General Electric recommends ALL pumps with 80,000 hours service be
inspected and monitored for cracks

TVA Nuclear
Shaft Crack History

Browns Ferry - Reactor Feed Pump

– October 1979

Browns Ferry - Recirculation Pump

– January 1984

Watts Barr - Main Feed Pump

Sequoyah - Centrifugal Charging Pump

– July 1981
– January 1994
– April 1999

Sequoyah - Reactor Coolant Pump

– October 2000
– April 2002
– Spring 2005

Fermi 2’s most notable mishap occurred on Christmas Day of 1993. The results of this accident was the dumping of hundreds of gallons of radioactive water directly into Lake Erie.
The catastrophic failure of the main turbine at Fermi 2, Christmas Day 1993
The main turbine automatically tripped due to an erroneous mechanical  overspeed signal caused by high vibrations. The reactor, which was  operating at 93 percent power, received an automatic scram signal triggered  by the turbine trip. The high vibration was caused by catastrophic failure of  the turbine blades. Ejected blade parts ripped through the turbine casing  and severed condenser tubes and other piping. The rupture of piping  supplying hydrogen gas to the generator for cooling caused a large fire. The  plant’s fire brigade took 37 minutes to muster, dress, and enter the turbine  building to fight the fire. Their efforts were hindered by numerous  communication problems, including malfunctions of personnel motion  detectors (e.g., “man down” alarms).
About 500,000 gallons of water from broken general service water piping  and turbine building closed cooling water piping flooded the radwaste  building basement to a depth of approximately six feet. Workers were slow  to isolate the systems with broken piping to terminate the flooding, due to  the total lack of procedures for a turbine building internal flood. The  severed  condenser tubes permitted water from Lake Michigan to flow into  the condenser hotwell, from where it was pumped to the condensate  storage tank. The standby feedwater system pumped water from the  condensate storage tank to the reactor vessel. The lake water caused  conductivity and chloride levels of the reactor vessel water to significantly  exceed specifications. (Fermi 2 Outage report  December 25, 1993 to  January 18,  1995 (1.1 years))

With 500 tons of spent fuel in a spent fuel pool located 5 floors above the ground at Fermi 2, there is another inconceivable and highly concerning problem facing the safe operation of the facility. Welds in the original blueprints from 1970 that were supposed to be built in to bolster vertical beams connecting the walls to the floors were never built in. According to Keegan, “So in 2010 discovery of missing welds that appeared on 1970 blue prints prevented the procedure of lifting the 125 tons of spent fuel bundles from the 5th floor down to ground with the crane. The floors and ceilings could not bare the load of the crane because welds were missing on the vertical beams. The crane is rated at 125 tons.”

DTE FERMI application to defer weld examinations:

They know, they don't care about anything but money.
Note the cancer spike came after the radioactive release into Lake Erie, which the idiotic government approved. Do you think we will get another dose with the present emergency? In case you missed it they also sent radioactive waste into Monroe wastewater system in 2010. They also put out "allowable" radiation every second.


  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9218
Your pollution is trespassing on my property!
« Reply #91 on: July 15, 2012, 07:45:11 AM »

The Fourth Amendment and the Common-Law Trespass Torts

  • ur law holds the property of every man so sacred, that no man can set his foot upon his neighbour’s close without his leave; if he does he is a trespasser, though he does no damage at all; if he will tread upon his neighbour’s ground, he must justify it by law.

This issue is most likely to play out in surprising ways when it comes to the question of what kinds of contact constitute a trespass. The line between tangible and intangible contacts is a problematic one in property law, as Justice Alito’s concurrence observes. For real property, a series of cases ask whether dust, vibrations, or radiation can sound in trespass, or whether they must be raised as nuisances. Radiation, in particular, will be of great interest for advanced surveillance technologies: imagine an active version of of the thermal scanning devices at stake in Kyllo v. United States. But land has other boundaries as well. If we’re committed to an originalist understanding of trespass, then the ad coelum rule presumably applies, which means drones need to stay out of the column of airspace above the suspect’s property (or at least the column above her house).

DTE stockholders need to take a look what is going on with GE stockholders. Get out of nuclear before you lose your pants.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2012, 07:47:21 AM by marilyn.monroe »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Up