MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Religion & Philosophy > The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down

Author Topic: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method  (Read 4053 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #60 on: June 17, 2012, 05:17:11 PM »

Again, LessGov avoided my arguments on topic to commit logical fallacies. It's not a matter of being smarter than anyone else, it's a matter of who is on the side of reality. I provide examples in nature and in the Bible, according to the historical method, you appeal the absurd arbitrary whims of an invisible god.


Now, address the evidences for evolution, in the other thread, providing a reasonable explanation of how creationism makes sense of these realities. And address my posts on the biblical problems with Jesus in light of your understanding/research.

Less, are you not getting this? I'll give others here the benefit of the doubt, but I'm starting to think you're a complete dunce. Do you know how to defend your side of an argument?

AGAIN, address the issue of the apocalyptic Jesus, using your Bible and research. Then go over to the evolution thread and provide a reasonable defense of how creationism makes sense of the world we live in. If you can't, then you've failed.
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #61 on: June 17, 2012, 08:04:29 PM »

Again, LessGov avoided my arguments on topic to commit logical fallacies. It's not a matter of being smarter than anyone else, it's a matter of who is on the side of reality. I provide examples in nature and in the Bible, according to the historical method, you appeal the absurd arbitrary whims of an invisible god.

Oh Xerxes, you are truly wasting your time, or desperate.  I have explained that I have every deliberate intention of not addressing your stupid arguments because we share absolutely NO common ground, and by your own admission, you WILL NOT be convinced or converted because you USED to be a Christian before you got so "wise" and "learned".

Here's logic for ya: Do you KNOW everything about everything in the world today?  Do you know HALF of everything?  The answer is a clear NO - and so - in the realm of things that you DON'T KNOW, God just may exist - and you cannot prove otherwise ... that logic sticks, that is REALITY, and the Bible says you are a fool for saying there is no God...you are a finite created being, and natural laws will eventually end your life; can you PROVE you do not have a soul?

Now, address the evidences for evolution, in the other thread, providing a reasonable explanation of how creationism makes sense of these realities. And address my posts on the biblical problems with Jesus in light of your understanding/research.

I don't really care to plant my comments in the thread you tell me to; because I know people watch Monroetalks, see that we are arguing, and they peek in to read our digs on each other's point of view irrespective of the thread title - have you "defeated" me because I answered Johnson35 in the thread he addressed me on evolution?  You need some work in proper punctuation usage BTW(and so do I).

I won't jump threads. I will just say that you said "vestiges and homology" - and I said I believe muscles are attached to them whale bones for the purposes of reproduction and that is the way God wanted it when He made them - as far as homology goes, a radius and ulna on ANY mammal doesn't mean humans descended from them because it could also be construed as evidence of a common DESIGNER ... how much of your stuff MUST I address, since I will NEVER convince a smart guy like you that creation happened the way God had His prophets/servants/disciples/apostles recorded it for us to read today?

Less, are you not getting this? I'll give others here the benefit of the doubt, but I'm starting to think you're a complete dunce. Do you know how to defend your side of an argument?

Wow, I may be a "complete dunce", eh?; and, you'll give others on Monroetalks "the benefit of the doubt" that they also are as smart as you perhaps in that they too think I am a "complete dunce"?  This coming from a guy the Bible renders a fool - man - better hand over my man card too!  Your drive by insults really don't help the credibility of your arguments; when Hovind prepares for a debate, do you think he ONLY prepares and opening statement, and then responds ONLY to what his opponent brings up for the next two hours? 

I have my perspective, and you have yours - and it doesn't look like you have proved evolution or that Jesus didn't exists, wasn't God in the flesh, or that the Gospel accounts are full of errors, holes, or lies.  You just THINK you have.

AGAIN, address the issue of the apocalyptic Jesus, using your Bible and research. Then go over to the evolution thread and provide a reasonable defense of how creationism makes sense of the world we live in. If you can't, then you've failed.

I don't have to address the issue of the apocalyptic Jesus; I CHOOSE to address your incessant tearing down of other people's faith in the Creator so named in our nation's Declaration of Independence - and - I CHOOSE to challenge you as to WHY you do it. 

Our founders didn't FAIL when they established this Republic; and I am no failure for studying primarily that which agrees with my belief system, as well as address what encourages my faith in Kent Hovind's materials who has already addressed many of your failed arguments and lies that support evolution theory.

I don't hang my head in shame for my beliefs...and I certainly am not alone in believing in a Supreme Being...WINNING!!!!!!!
« Last Edit: June 18, 2012, 01:51:33 AM by LessGovernment »
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #62 on: June 17, 2012, 08:15:20 PM »

Give it up,Less; no one can win a discussion with the superior intellect of THE XERXES! He does not believe in God unless God is hindu, when he capitalizes God. The "christian god" cannot be capitalized, because he does not exist, according to the superior intellect of the former christian XERXES. Do not attempt any dialogue with XERXES, because his intellect is beyond anything you can imagine. Just ask him. Send him a PM! He doesn't seem to like me, for some reason.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 08:27:24 PM by sammy »
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #63 on: June 17, 2012, 08:31:49 PM »

Oh Xerxes, you are truly wasting your time, or desperate.  I have explained that I have every deliberate intention of no addressing your stupid arguments because we share absolutely NO common ground, and by your own admission, you WILL NOT be convinced or converted because you USED to be a Christian before you got so "wise" and "learned".

Nice cop out.


Quote
Do you KNOW everything about everything in the world today?  Do you know HALF of everything?  The answer is a clear NO - and so - in the realm of things that you DON'T KNOW, God just may exists - and you cannot prove otherwise ... that logic sticks, that is REALITY, and the Bible says you are a fool for saying there is no God...you are a finite created being, and natural laws will eventually end your life; can you PROVE you do not have a soul?

Shifting the Burden of Proof. You are making the *positive* claim that this god of yours made the world, etc.; therefore, the burden of proof in on YOU! The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.

I'm saying, "I have no need to accept your positive claims without evidence!" Therefore, the burden of proof is not on my shoulder to disprove extraordinary positive claims, made by YOU. I can look at the world without reading miracles into it.


Quote
I will just say that you said "vestiges and homology" - and I said I believe muscles are attached to them whale bones for the purposes of reproduction...

Show me scientific peer reviewed research to support this claim. I can provide ample research that this is NOT the case, and that they are, in fact, vestigial. I can give research done by men that spend their entire lives working on vestiges alone.

But hey, what would such fools know, being they deny the creation account of Genesis?


Quote
This coming from a guy the Bible renders a fool - man - better hand over my man card too!

Yeah, because if the Bible says it, which supports RAPE, INFANTICIDE, SLAVERY, etc., then it MUST be true, and anyone who disagrees with its absurd BS is a fool.


Quote
I have my perspective, and you have yours - and it doesn't look like you have proved evolution or that Jesus didn't exists, wasn't God in the flesh, or that the Gospel accounts are full of errors, holes, or lies.

I'm putting what I have on the table to support my stance. You put circular reasoning. Circular reasoning and other fallacious comments are a joke compared to the historical method and critical thought in relation to it.


Quote
I don't have to address the issue of the apocalyptic Jesus... 

You have no plans on discussing the points of the discussion. You only wish to say, "He's a fool because he uses the historical method to show the discrepancies of this book people call infallible!"

Sigh...
Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #64 on: June 17, 2012, 09:08:51 PM »

Toldya, Less; He's smarter than we'all put together . He is by his own admission, more erudite than  those who dare to oppose his positions.  And yet, we peons are invited to "discuss" his views, as long as we'all don't oppose his views. He is a true patrician, and all should bow to his superior intellect. He jus' be smarter than us, doncha know?
Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #65 on: June 17, 2012, 09:46:29 PM »

Ladies and gentleman, we have now arrived at the "I'm Xerxes and I'm smart - you're all dumb and less educated than me" portion of this thread also...

All these discussion arrive here, and its always the evolutionists who puff their chests out this way.

Johnson asked of me in THIS thread, so I answer him in THIS thread...duh!
As far as addressing all your garbage evidence that tax dollars supports in the wild imagination of hellbent God-deniers, especially when all you do is rip on bible believers and now Pastors; I just reassert what a joke you are for being deliberately blind to your side's end game...which is...eliminate the opposition that exposes our hypocrisy when we use THEIR religion to gain political/secular power/control over humanity.

You are only a student of rationalizing your own God-rejecting belief system, which there has always been a market for; but you are in total denial of what GOOD believers in the Creator(so named in our nation's Declaration of Independence) have done in world history - and - subsequently what EVIL God-deniers and Christ-rejecters have done(and still do) in world history!

God did it, God is not limited, God is the Creator and Ultimate Judge is no dumb unthinking wishful philosophy...now desiring that the population that believes in something higher than what mankind can see, feel, touch be done away with for the benefit of NO ONE is pretty dumb and unthinking.

I defer to the work of God-gifted creationists who have seen what you have posted here for evidence, and spend their time answering your stuff in the scientific vernacular/arguments you desire.  It always gets to the point that you guys abandon science and go to a relgion, like your vestigal/homology arguments; and as smart as you are you fail to see that.

Hovind successfully destroyed enough guys way smarter than you, and that is why he had to be dealt with...as an example...instead of buying himself cars, boats, mansions, wives and boyfriends like other charlatans with his ministry "offerings", he provided employment for people, encouraged lawmakers, pastors, and other believers that our founders were RIGHT about the moral and authoratative attributes of our Creator...

I am sure them evidences you cite have all been addressed elsewhere and your evolution theory is NOT factually evident/provable enough in that politicians would not claim they are Christians in America in order to get elected by a majority Christian electorate.

I have defended my personal beliefs here, and have given some reason to question your motives and positions that are antithetical to this Republic's founding and moral underpinnings...I really don't care what you think about the real existence of Jesus, lying Gospels, or normalcy of homosexual behavior...I care about the America I leave behind to my children and our nation's posterity; so I shed some light on your impossible theory, irritated you in the process, and helped to  preserve our good American belief in the Creator Jesus Christ!

And I did on Father's Day!  While hanging with my 5 kids at a public pool, and doing flips and Splash dives off a 3 meter spring board!!!  Good times!
Right on, Less! every"discussion" started by XERXES finally comes down to "I'm smarter than you'all and you'all are as dumb as dirt if you can't see my point of view".   Started when he was "christian", and continues now that he has been enlightened by the Eastern religions he reveres. Notice how God is in capitals when he speaks of the eastern religions, but is not when he speaks of Christianity. Why does he speak of God in the eastern religions, when he declares over and over that God/ god does not exist? just sayin'!
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #66 on: June 17, 2012, 10:03:01 PM »

Another post meant to troll. But, again, I'll bite.


The reason I don't capitalize the "G" when speaking of the Biblical god, is because this god is a tyrant. It called for the slaughter of babies for the sins of the parents. (Numbers 31) It promoted slavery and RAPE.

Don't think so?

Concerning Female Slaves Taken in Battle - Deuteronomy 21:10-14


“When you go out to war against your enemies, and the Lord your God delivers them into your hand, and you take them captive, and you see among the captives a beautiful woman, and desire her and would take her for your wife, then you shall bring her home to your house, and she shall shave her head and trim her nails. She shall put off the clothes of her captivity, remain in your house, and mourn her father and her mother a full month; after that you may have sex with her and be her husband, and she shall be your wife. And it shall be, if you have no delight in her, then you shall set her free, but you certainly shall not sell her for money; you shall not treat her brutally, because you have had sex with her. - End Quote


So, after you MURDER her family. You may have sex with her 30 days later, provided you let her sorrow for 30 days. BUT if you're not pleased with this piece of arse, you let her go free.

LISTEN! Those women DID NOT want to have SEX with the men that just hacked their families to pieces! That is RAPE! I could go on and on quoting the disgusting crimes of this god.


I don't have any particular god. I don't revere Shiva over Vishnu, etc., etc... The stories about the gods of Hinduism are myths. I doubt Krishna even existed, etc. I can capitalize the *G* in God when I mention Brahman, as Brahman is the life-force of all, not some theistic god who murders innocent people for the sins of others.



And, yes, when it comes to the point of the god of the bible being god, I will say, I'm more intelligent than those who believe the god of the bible is the one true god. They may be more intelligent in other areas, like in mathematics, or music, etc., but in this point I'm more intelligent. Just as Christians believe they are more intelligent in believing their god is a greater god than Allah - another war criminal.



« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 10:05:55 PM by Xerxes »
Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #67 on: June 17, 2012, 10:18:58 PM »

So, you do believe in God, as long as he/she is not Muslim or Christian? Buudha/tao/whatever is OK? As long as god  is not the God of the Bible, you're OK? Told ya' before, I'm NOT trolling, just commenting. If you can't handle that, you may need to start your own forum, where never is heard a discouraging word. Sometimes, we all need our little private places!
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #68 on: June 17, 2012, 10:33:11 PM »

So, you do believe in God, as long as he/she is not Muslim or Christian? Buudha/tao/whatever is OK? As long as god  is not the God of the Bible...


The Christian god is made in the image of ancient warring Hebrews. It's the image of an angry, warlike, jealous man; same with Islam.

Buddhism does not have a god. Taoism does not have a god. And Brahman is considered the Supreme God, but, again, Brahman is the life-force or substance of all; he has no brain, no body; he doesn't become jealous, etc., etc...

I don't agree fully with any religion or faith, and that's because I think for myself. Do I know everything about the afterlife, etc? Of course not! I tend to oppose those who think they do, while condemning to HELL those who don't. Like, Less, he thinks every non-christian is going to hell, even if they live a more holy life than himself. Why? All because they don't believe in his image of god.

I do not believe the universe was thoughtfully designed or controlled by some overseer who is calculating and running the show, as many faiths do. If someone can provide ample evidence I'll consider what they say.



Now, wanna hear about how the god of the Bible said he'd cause pregnant women to be cut open and their fetuses trampled underfoot, or how he said he'd cause women to eat their children and placentas in private? Wanna hear how he killed infants for the sins of their parents, or how he had bears kill children for messing with old Elisha?

You know the Bible says King David was a man after god's own heart, and it was David that said, "Blessed is the man that seizes hold of your babies, and dashes them to death upon the rocks."

Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #69 on: June 17, 2012, 10:45:41 PM »


The Christian god is made in the image of ancient warring Hebrews. It's the image of an angry, warlike, jealous man; same with Islam.

Buddhism does not have a god. Taoism does not have a god. And Brahman is considered the Supreme God, but, again, Brahman is the life-force or substance of all; he has no brain, no body; he doesn't become jealous, etc., etc...

I don't agree fully with any religion or faith, and that's because I think for myself. Do I know everything about the afterlife, etc? Of course not! I tend to oppose those who think they do, while condemning to HELL those who don't. Like, Less, he thinks every non-christian is going to hell, even if they live a more holy life than himself. Why? All because they don't believe in his image of god.

I do not believe the universe was thoughtfully designed or controlled by some overseer who is calculating and running the show, as many faiths do. If someone can provide ample evidence I'll consider what they say.



Now, wanna hear about how the god of the Bible said he'd cause pregnant women to be cut open and their fetuses trampled underfoot, or how he said he'd cause women to eat their children and placentas in private? Wanna hear how he killed infants for the sins of their parents, or how he had bears kill children for messing with old Elisha?

You know the Bible says King David was a man after god's own heart, and it was David that said, "Blessed is the man that seizes hold of your babies, and dashes them to death upon the rocks."


You just love to hate the God of the Bible,don't you ? Please tell us what traumatic event turned you against Christianity. Don't try to tell us it was your study of other religions/philosophy. Your turnaround was WAY too fast for that! We'all ain't as stoopid as you give us credit for!
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #70 on: June 17, 2012, 11:31:20 PM »

You just love to hate the God of the Bible, don't you? Please tell us what traumatic event turned you against Christianity. Don't try to tell us it was your study of other religions/philosophy. Your turnaround was WAY too fast for that!


Well, first, I saw a flash of light! Was it headlights? I didn't know. Then I saw alien grays, like bobble-headed praying mantis in mad-scientist suits! I clinched my arse cheeks together. There was no way they'd take my temperature tonight! BUT, before I knew it I was out cold, like Lane-Craig in a debate against Ehrman.

I awoke on a cold table, like a thanksgiving turkey. They said I had fine genes, to which I strangely uttered, "Thanks." They extracted *Grade A* semen, like from the tit of a cow. I felt molested for the first time. They said, "These hybrids will be some of the best we've ever made!" I wept like an alter boy under the gaze of a perverted priest!

Right then and there, I said, "The god of the Bible is NOT God!"



Sammy, you're right. I *am* more intelligent than you.

« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 11:33:08 PM by Xerxes »
Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #71 on: June 17, 2012, 11:37:30 PM »

WHATEVER! Not buying! And no; no you are not! You may be slyer, and smarter, but not more intelligent.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2012, 11:40:07 PM by sammy »
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #72 on: June 17, 2012, 11:44:55 PM »

WHATEVER! Not buying! And no; no you are not! You may be slyer, and smarter, but not more intelligent.

Boy... Satan really has this guy deceived. These invisible angels, at war with God, are really busy these days. I'll pray for you in the magical name of Jesus.  :)
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #73 on: June 18, 2012, 03:01:48 AM »

I love it - I got Sammy for back up ... admittedly, Sammy and I didn't get along once if I remember correctly ...

Xerx, 'ol pal; you are having a temper tantrum because you want somebody to say you "win" - well - win WHAT?

You're severely outnumbered in your God doesn't exist philosophy.

I have NAILED you five ways to Sunday already ... you DO NOT believe in the God of the Bible, or Christ, or His miracles - there is NO WAY you can possibly understand one jot or tittle of that book because of your ATTITUDE.

God doesn't want people of ONLY great intellect to find him; remember, you ripped on Calvinism and the idea of the "elect" - God accepts the simple, who accept Him as GOOD, and loving Creator.  Now, simple faith doesn't mean we are morons; as you think every Pastor in Monroe is(because they run scared from you and your incredible historical knowledge, application of brilliant logic, and thorough understanding of what millions of years can do to turn a pine cone into a Koala Bear) - God expects that once the believer has an understanding of His righteous place as deed-holder over this planet, loving judge etc. - He expects us to pursue wisdom, knowledge, and apply what we have learned to resist sin and that eases stress(guilt).

See, it's always tit-for-tat with you, which makes you the horrible, non-attentive debater; you say I shift the burden of proof BUT I am not asking for tax dollars to support my religion - therefore you LOSE that argument every time. 

People, like yourself, are FREE to reject the Bible and Christianity - you may CHOOSE not to attend church, give money, hand out bible tracks at the county fair, or serve a meal to a homeless person on Thanksgiving Day; but my CHILDREN are not necessarily free to skip out on public school that shoves your dumb "millions of years" crap about dinosaurs down their throat in kindergarten and first grade, from books that are about 36" wide and 48" tall with BIG PICTURES of Bronchiosaurs - right up through your vestigal whale hind legs crap in high school - without the government up my butt with a microscope claiming truancy or child neglect; even though God gave the children to me and my wife, and, there is NO PROOF for millions of years!

Guys like me have to WORK hard(and for FREE) to try to get these lies out of textbooks, because your side wants to interfere with our family's faith that I choose to teach, by teaching fairly tales with TAX DOLLARS.

Now you call un-peer reviewed, unpublished scientists(creationists) fools - I am certain Kent Hovind and many others have exposed the bias/railroading/stripping of careers, positions etc. of creationists for finding things that debunk evolution.  Creationists don't get their stuff reviewed and published oftentimes because they are mocked as religionists; the esteem of their secular counterparts, and the government money rarely makes it their way. 

Look man, you're not smarter than the pastors; and you're definitely not smarter than the creationist who invented the MRI machine if you are an atheist who thinks you can prove the non-existence of God through name-calling and ad hominem attacks; as well as back-handed slaps at Pastor John MacArthur who is a pretty straight shooter.

See, we don't care about your assertions because you are the one with the condescending attitude; truth is, the Bible says guys like you don't WANT proof for creation, or an answer to anything you post - you are just trying to get people upset, make them doubt themselves, and it is in no way prosperous for our culture or society.

Do science, study science, use science for GOOD; and you can do all of that while leaving origins out of it - because - NOBODY saw it happen either 4.6 billion years ago, or, 6,000 years ago.

Your Old Testament Bible references are a joke too.  Citations of men disobeying God of their own accord, during/after a war campaign, is not evidence that the God of the Bible is the author of their personal crimes.  Number 31:14-16, I think I pointed out before; the soldiers under the officers DISOBEYED the Lord by not killing "these [the women who] caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor", and there was a plague among the congregation for it(consequences) - and the lives of those women that were spared(a GOOD THING), there is no proof of violent slavery occurred that made the God of the Bible gleeful, accepting, and pleased - or any evidence that rape/adultery went unpunished when it happened...

Your lack of understanding about war(aggressive versus defensive - vengeance for previous crimes/wars etc.), as I pointed out before, is no proof for the non-existence of God.  The whole world is cursed with sin; injustice, suffering of every sort happens - and - who is gleefully behind it; Satan, the one who wants everyone made in God's image killed, since he knows one day some seed of a woman is going to bruise his head.

The Bible doesn't support the things you say it does, period.  The "historical method" you keep blabbering on about also, probably wouldn't hold up to Thomas Jefferson's approach to good government - even though he ripped the miracle accounts of Jesus out of his Bible, he still penned the words "...rights endowed by their Creator..." in our Declaration of Independence.  I know you and Jefferson deny miracles, but, there is no way a guy like him would support your communist leanings by shoving "God doesn't exist" down the throat of innocent school children with tax dollars.

That MEANS we can do all the observing of the natural, and stay within the natural, love and teach science - advance medicine/aerospace technology - without deliberately using tax dollars to upset predominately GOOD people who pay taxes willingly, and believe God created, by attacking/mocking them and their religion.

Hey man, don't go to church, that is your choice; nobody will ever make you go to church and give money to Jesus in America - but - if you wanna get on a forum and call us stupid, undereducated, dupes, trolls, crutch-bearing non-intellectuals, illogical, or deceived - we'll come at ya and rip on your religion too...hope you don't mind.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2012, 03:08:36 AM by LessGovernment »
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: The Impossible Life of Jesus – The Historical Method
« Reply #74 on: June 18, 2012, 04:15:48 AM »

Typical Argumentum Verbosium.


I love it - I got Sammy for back up.

You can have him on your side, as his method of discussion isn't beneficial to his stance; although, he's never shown a stance, only pop comments and insults.


Quote
You're severely outnumbered in your God doesn't exist philosophy.

An Appeal to Majority never meant anything.


Quote
I have NAILED you five ways to Sunday already ... you DO NOT believe in the God of the Bible, or Christ, or His miracles - there is NO WAY you can possibly understand one jot or tittle of that book because of your ATTITUDE.

The only thing your nailing is your religion to a cross, where it won't rise again. The typical fallacy of Christians, "You don't believe, therefore, you cannot understand!"

Like believing gives some special ability to understand. Christianity is collectively confused, with a different denomination on every other corner. And many don't believe the others to be true Christians.

This is like playing a child at chess.


Quote
Now, simple faith doesn't mean we are morons; as you think every Pastor in Monroe is (because they run scared from you and your incredible historical knowledge, application of brilliant logic, and thorough understanding of what millions of years can do to turn a pine cone into a Koala Bear)

Irrelevant Humor fallacies, which misrepresent the opposing side never won an argument.


Quote
See, it's always tit-for-tat with you, which makes you the horrible, non-attentive debater; you say I shift the burden of proof BUT I am not asking for tax dollars to support my religion - therefore you LOSE that argument every time. 

People, like yourself, are FREE to reject the Bible and Christianity - you may CHOOSE not to attend church, give money, hand out bible tracks at the county fair, or serve a meal to a homeless person on Thanksgiving Day; but my CHILDREN are not necessarily free to skip out on public school that shoves your dumb "millions of years" crap about dinosaurs down their throat in kindergarten and first grade, from books that are about 36" wide and 48" tall with BIG PICTURES of Bronchiosaurs - right up through your vestigal whale hind legs crap in high school - without the government up my butt with a microscope claiming truancy or child neglect; even though God gave the children to me and my wife, and, there is NO PROOF for millions of years!

No proof for millions of years?

When volcanic magma cools it creates igneous rock. Within this igneous rock are crystals with radioactive isotopes of potassium-40, which decay at a constant rate into argon-40. When the rocks first cool there isn't any argon-40, only potassium-40; therefore, the rocks are zeroed in. When the rock cools, the timer starts!

When they look at the ratio of potassium-40 and argon-40, in relation to the constant decay rate, they can accurately tell you how old those igneous rocks are. Some creationists say water can affect this, but that's not true, as water would not wash the isotopes out of the inside of crystals.

Get over it. It will ALWAYS be taught in schools, even after you religion is gone.  ;D


Quote
Guys like me have to WORK hard(and for FREE) to try to get these lies out of textbooks, because your side wants to interfere with our family's faith that I choose to teach, by teaching fairly tales with TAX DOLLARS.

You'll never get it out of textbooks.


Quote
Look man, you're not smarter than the pastors; and you're definitely not smarter than the creationist who invented the MRI machine if you are an atheist who thinks you can prove the non-existence of God through name-calling and ad hominem attacks; as well as back-handed slaps at Pastor John MacArthur who is a pretty straight shooter.

Actually, in this matter I am, just as you say you're more intelligent for believing in Yahweh over Allah.

John MacArthur teaches the tyrant god of Romans 9. I'll address the evils of Calvinism in another thread, if needs be, where I can thoughtfully explain this sadistic nonsense.


Quote
Do science, study science, use science for GOOD; and you can do all of that while leaving origins out of it - because - NOBODY saw it happen either 4.6 billion years ago, or, 6,000 years ago.

When volcanic magma cools it creates igneous rock. Within this igneous rock are crystals with radioactive isotopes of potassium-40, which decay at a constant rate into argon-40. When the rocks first cool there isn't any argon-40, only potassium-40; therefore, the rocks are zeroed in. When the rock cools, the timer starts!

When they look at the ratio of potassium-40 and argon-40, in relation to the constant decay rate, they can accurately tell you how old those igneous rocks are. Some creationists say water can affect this, but that's not true, as water would not wash the isotopes out of the inside of crystals.

[thinks to self] Maybe if he reads it enough times he'll get it... [/thinks to self]


Quote
Your Old Testament Bible references are a joke too.  Citations of men disobeying God of their own accord, during/after a war campaign, is not evidence that the God of the Bible is the author of their personal crimes.  Number 31:14-16, I think I pointed out before; the soldiers under the officers DISOBEYED the Lord by not killing "these [the women who] caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor", and there was a plague among the congregation for it(consequences) - and the lives of those women that were spared(a GOOD THING), there is no proof of violent slavery occurred that made the God of the Bible gleeful, accepting, and pleased - or any evidence that rape/adultery went unpunished when it happened...

Sick. Is it any wonder the majority of Nazi's believed they were Christians?

They did a study on a group of young Christians. They had them read the war crimes of Moses and Joshua, who did these things for god, as it reads. And after reading they were asked, "Was this acceptable behavior?" They said, "Yes, because God called for it."

They took another group of young Christians. They had them read the same war crimes but changed the name of Moses and Joshua to General so-and-so, and they changed Canaanites to Chinese. After reading they were asked, "Was this acceptable behavior?" They said "NO."

You can read more on this study in "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins.


Quote
Your lack of understanding about war(aggressive versus defensive - vengeance for previous crimes/wars etc.), as I pointed out before, is no proof for the non-existence of God.  The whole world is cursed with sin; injustice, suffering of every sort happens - and - who is gleefully behind it; Satan, the one who wants everyone made in God's image killed, since he knows one day some seed of a woman is going to bruise his head.

Actually, I know quite a bit about war.

AH, yes! It's SATAN! It's the invisible angel from another dimension, who was cast to Earth!

THIS is why rational people think you're a joke.


Quote
The Bible doesn't support the things you say it does, period.  The "historical method" you keep blabbering on about also, probably wouldn't hold up to Thomas Jefferson's approach to good government - even though he ripped the miracle accounts of Jesus out of his Bible, he still penned the words "...rights endowed by their Creator..." in our Declaration of Independence.  I know you and Jefferson deny miracles, but, there is no way a guy like him would support your communist leanings by shoving "God doesn't exist" down the throat of innocent school children with tax dollars.

I don't care what Jefferson thought on the matter. I'm talking to YOU and others here. Address my points, on topic, or just continue to show your lack of being able to do so..

Again, reasonable answer the discrepancies I've posted in this thread, which was the purpose of this thread - to discuss The Impossible Life of Jesus - The Historical Method. If you're able to. If not, I'll continue to point out your lack of being able to do so.


Quote
...we'll come at ya and rip on your religion too...hope you don't mind.

Being it on, it just gives me a bigger stage to offer more reasons as to why your faith is a joke. I have just begun to share the reasons why people need to give up these primitive beliefs. The more you respond the way you do, the more you play into my hand.

Sammy told me that no one takes what I say seriously, but I have caused quite a few people to lose faith in these absurd beliefs, over the past few years. I've led more out of this absurd faith and into reason than I ever won into Christianity as a Christian. I have the evidence to show I'm accomplishing something in helping people to think critically.




« Last Edit: June 18, 2012, 04:23:39 AM by Xerxes »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up