MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Religion & Philosophy > Use and Abuse of Logic


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Use and Abuse of Logic  (Read 3236 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

eriemermaid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13258
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2012, 08:46:53 PM »


I've whipped you in calling you a mocker/naysayer; Hovind's scientific evidence and personal life experience in the sciences whips you, MacArthur whips you .
Oh boy, can I whip you?   8)
 
Logged

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2012, 08:55:47 PM »

Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2012, 09:21:35 PM »

I don't watch your videos.

Nobody expects you to ... just like you don't really expect me to read your recommended books by renown de-converted Bart-boy!  Maybe the audience does though - and where they go from there neither of us know; so, once again, nothing CONCRETE has been proven in this latest chapter of "The Long War Against God"

Why won't you read Bart Ehrman? Scared?


Quote
You're whole list of fallacies is/will be cut and paste off another website - even if you could recite them verbatim, in alphabetical order, with clear definitions, on a stage debating Kent Hovind personally it wouldn't LOGICALLY prove the creation, flood, life/death/resurrection of Christ didn't happen the way the Bible says it did ...

Logical fallacy of Shifting the Burden of Proof. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claims. Put up or shut up and be mocked.


Quote
Do you really think you're that smart/intellectually superior/evolved?

What does this question have to do with the price of tea in China? Logical fallacy.


Quote
I've whipped you in calling you a mocker/naysayer; Hovind's scientific evidence and personal life experience in the sciences whips you, MacArthur whips you as relates to you coming along and mocking believers with your denial of the two cataclysms, your belief that a one cell thing in a puddle somewhere said "I think I'll be two", and your uniformatariasm(things have always gone on thae same way we see them now since the beginning) - your MOTIVATIONS are clear to everyone - words and words and words and more words WILL NOT ever disprove what you think is disproveable, yet is not because it is(as Ducksoup pointed out) a FAITH issue that BOTH SIDES have "arguments"/evidence for ...

Saying that is NOT an argument. Just saying Hovind and MacArthur whip me is NOT an argument from your side. And pointing out my so called motivations is NOT an argument to the points I put forth.

Are you that void of critical thinking?

And Ducksoup took me out of context. Have I not discussed the benefits of having faith in reasonable things backed by reality?

You're committing an Equivocation Fallacy here.


Quote
Now, you too can "poision the well", cast doubt, tire people out and think you've won the debate as though it is a contest of endurance - but seriously, inherent in all mankind is knowledge of a Creator; to drown out and silence that conscience by heaping to oneself the wisdom of men who also reject God for whatever reason is no great display of intellect - just selfishness.

Endurance? This doesn't take much endurance. This doesn't take much energy.

And I don't poison the well, as I offer ARGUMENTS. Look at my last thread on how Science voids certain religious beliefs. Did I not put forth an argument against Genesis 1, and an argument against the appeal to fine tuning?

Have I not provided exhaustive evidence for evolution, such as ERV's, fossils, atavisms, vestiges, geographical distribution of species, etc., etc. Have I not provided detailed explanations of simulations that mimic randomness in nature, showing how complexity can arise without the need of thoughtful design? Have I not provided valid arguments against Bible discrepancies and problems in light of the historical method? Have I not made cases against the disgusting promotions of violence, slavery, and misogyny in your Bible?

I HAVE provided arguments. You have NOT. You use logical fallacy after logical fallacy. You always attack the person's character and motive without ever touching the real argument.

GET A CLUE, LESS.


Quote
Start as many threads as you want - sad that you have that much time on your hands to play this game; I do have to get off here for a while and spend time in person with people who like the "cut of my jib" at work(I loan out John MacArthur sermons to people who want to know MORE about their faith, and what the Bible says about certain topics/stories)...

Double-Standard. You post just as much as I do, and post just as many words. How many times do I have to point out your dumb use of a double-standard.

GET A CLUE, LESS.

Quote
There is SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE on both sides(remember, with respect to origins, they are THEORIES)...ignoring the evidence that supports one(given by Hovind) and saying somebody else who recommends his seminars doesn't debate "properly", doesn't use logic properly, or doesn't address your NONSENSE directly to YOUR points is more of that same as YOU AVOID the truth about creation/the Creator/Christianity.

Provide the scientific evidence for creationism. I'm waiting. You know where the evolution thread is. And while you're at it answer the myriad evidences I already presented. The evidence you IGNORE.

I don't care about Hovind. YOU present the argument from your own research.

Quote
I've seen all your rhetoric before on site's like http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/05/michael-scherme-1.html  If you want to emulate those people, have at it - birds of a feather flock together; on with my fundamentalist Christian faith I go...

So where's your arguments then?
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2012, 10:39:50 PM »

Provide the scientific evidence for creationism.
Your biggest "logical fallacy" is your pre-built assumptions about the age of the Earth, and the origins of religions and the Bible, and your probabilities/staistical models that come from an appeal to authority because you are so impressed and enamoured by their scholastic achievements ... where is YOUR personal research and study and published science?

Hovind has it, you don't.  You and Bart quit the faith, I didn't.  Now you think you are intellectually superior to anyone because you study debate tactics; that doesn't explain the whales buried in diatematious Earth, petrified trees standing up through multiple rock layers that are supposed to be different ages by millions of years, that doesn't explain giant rock formations assembled by human hands with rocks weighing more than contemporary cranes can hoist - that doesn't explain how language/speech/morality and the ability to accumulate knowledge and convey thoughts over great distances EVOLVED from the grunts and groans of animals ... what do you have WITHOUT using the word "probably"???

You want evidence? or, do you want to pick apart my sentence structures, frame of reference, and presentation that supports my clear BIAS? 

Gimme a break - nice solid conclusion; "Put up or shut up and be mocked." YOU WON!!! ;D

Mock all you want - must be nice to have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer ALL DAY LONG mocking people, what a life!

 
« Last Edit: July 24, 2012, 10:42:09 PM by LessGovernment »
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2012, 11:04:39 PM »

Provide the scientific evidence for creationism.
Your biggest "logical fallacy" is your pre-built assumptions about the age of the Earth, and the origins of religions and the Bible, and your probabilities/staistical models that come from an appeal to authority because you are so impressed and enamoured by their scholastic achievements ... where is YOUR personal research and study and published science?

FACT.  When volcanic magma cools it creates igneous rock. Within this igneous rock are crystals with radioactive isotopes of potassium-40, which decay at a constant rate into argon-40. When the rocks first cool there isn't any argon-40, only potassium-40; therefore, the rocks are zeroed in. When the rock cools, the timer starts!

When they look at the ratio of potassium-40 and argon-40, in relation to the constant decay rate, they can accurately tell you how old those igneous rocks are. Some creationists say water can affect this, but that's not true, as water would not wash the isotopes out of the inside of crystals.


Quote
Hovind has it, you don't.  You and Bart quit the faith, I didn't.  Now you think you are intellectually superior to anyone because you study debate tactics; that doesn't explain the whales buried in diatematious Earth, petrified trees standing up through multiple rock layers that are supposed to be different ages by millions of years, that doesn't explain giant rock formations assembled by human hands with rocks weighing more than contemporary cranes can hoist - that doesn't explain how language/speech/morality and the ability to accumulate knowledge and convey thoughts over great distances EVOLVED from the grunts and groans of animals ... what do you have WITHOUT using the word "probably"???

Provide a source for this polystrate whale and I'll research it.


Quote
You want evidence? or, do you want to pick apart my sentence structures, frame of reference, and presentation that supports my clear BIAS? 

I'm picking apart your faulty logic and lack of an argument. The whales being polystrate are your best attempt all week.

Quote
Gimme a break - nice solid conclusion; "Put up or shut up and be mocked." YOU WON!!! ;D

Mock all you want - must be nice to have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer ALL DAY LONG mocking people, what a life!

Again, Mr. Double-Standard, you're on here just as much as I am.
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #20 on: July 25, 2012, 01:29:40 AM »

FACT: your citing other peoples research.

FACT: creationists have contributed to the field of science.

FACT: I never asked you to "put up" insomuch as I suggested you "shut up" because you're mocking people of faith for no good reason. 

FACT: There is no scientific evidence that PROVES God doesn't exist...

FACT: I could stay off here for months at a time; can you? 
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #21 on: July 25, 2012, 03:32:22 AM »

Making fun of others for what they believe. Why do it?

Xerxes, you've stated that you believe that God is Nature, or something to that effect. If that's what you believe, more power to you.

Do I ask you to provide evidence to back up your opinion? No.

Why? Because ALL religions are merely opinions, and mine is no better than yours, and yours is no better than mine. Antagonizing each other only furthers anger, hate and aggression.

People will believe what they want to believe, however, stating that someone is dumb, or stupid, or ignorant because of whatever God they believe in, doesn't do anyone any good.

If someone is ready to find another path, they will, but they won't be forced into it by anyone else.

You once considered yourself a Christian, now you do not. Did someone force you to change your mind, or did you come about it by yourself?

Why must you force your opinion onto others?

Why do you antagonize those who don't believe as you do?
Logged

Forsythia

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #22 on: July 25, 2012, 08:21:27 AM »

FACT: your citing other peoples research.

FACT: creationists have contributed to the field of science.

FACT: I never asked you to "put up" insomuch as I suggested you "shut up" because you're mocking people of faith for no good reason. 

FACT: There is no scientific evidence that PROVES God doesn't exist...

FACT: I could stay off here for months at a time; can you?

Fact you site other peoples research.

Fact Hovind did not graduate from an accredited university.

Fact I have read Hovinds paper cover to cover and it sounds like it was written by an 8 year old.

Fact Evolution...
Logged
For those who have problems with my posts, please feel free to fill out the form at the link below and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGF4UVJ5UmpZLUhzX0dMNEotSEljTXc6MQ


Ignorance is only blissful for the ignorant.  The rest of us have to put up with you idiots.

"Prayer is nothing more than bargain basement anger." A. LaVey


"A christian telling an atheist he is going to hell is about as scary as a small child telling an adult they won't get any presents from santa." - R. Gervais

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2012, 09:51:12 AM »

Maybe you two that assert humans evolved from non-living material billions of years ago with nothing but a foolish dismissal of the obvious have some mature insults for this creationist who had your God-less evolution hogwash(called a LIE) shoved down his throat at Princeton University in 1941?

Keep them coming; you're just like children who simply refuse to obey instruction.  Maybe Xerxes has some cut and paste research on how Princeton wasn't educationally equipped/qualified to teach about evolution in the 1940's; and so, sadly, this creation evangelist with a doctorate from an accredited university(which is supposed to satisfy Forsythia, but won't!) fell through the cracks of government's attempt to manufacture a godless society of dependent slaves to Communism - where government provides all - and therefore is "god".

It's only 2 minutes and 50 seconds if you can endure it; I've met him personally, and have completed one of his courses...but again...I seemingly follow after 8 years-old's who speak in kindergarten language and teach fairy tales that I can understand...

"The World that Perished" by Dr. John Whitcomb
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #24 on: July 25, 2012, 09:59:04 AM »

FACT: your citing other peoples research.

As John MacArthur's hero CH Spurgeon said, "He who will not learn with the brains of other men proves to have no brain of his own."

Point is, I provide an ARGUMENT, based off my studies.


Quote
FACT: creationists have contributed to the field of science.

Doesn't mean creationism is true. Logical fallacy. LOGIC, man.


Quote
FACT: I never asked you to "put up" insomuch as I suggested you "shut up" because you're mocking people of faith for no good reason.


People that deny evolution with aggression, who oppose homosexuals because of a book and without a sound argument, those who abuse their children with teachings of everlasting punishment, etc., etc., are being opposed for GOOD cause.

Quote
FACT: There is no scientific evidence that PROVES God doesn't exist...

Shifting the Burden of Proof. You're making the positive claims we'll go to an invisible judgment after death, where we'll stand before the god who calls for infanticide. The burden of proof sits heavy on your shoulders.

Quote
FACT: I could stay off here for months at a time; can you?


What does that matter to a Religion and Philosophy category? Are you that void of logic?
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #25 on: July 25, 2012, 10:16:39 AM »

Making fun of others for what they believe. Why do it?

This is a category to discuss and debate religion. I enjoy discussing and debating it. I think it can be beneficial. Look at Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris. They oppose religion with fiery zeal, and it's paid off for them. They've won scores to their side. As a Christian I didn't like their style, but it was effective in bluntly driving points home to me. And I'm thankful to have been awakened from such a delusion.



Quote
Xerxes, you've stated that you believe that God is Nature, or something to that effect. If that's what you believe, more power to you.

Do I ask you to provide evidence to back up your opinion? No.

Yet, I can reasonably explain what I mean by that, without the need of any absurd appeals. I don't hold to the idea of a thoughtful designer or a supreme controller of all life's details.

For example, Einstein said his god was the god of Spinoza (and I'm not saying Einstein was right, but this is a good example). Yet, as Dawkins has said such a god is really sexed-up atheism. It's romantic language that says, "What is is God." But again, no appeals to invisible gods beyond the clouds, and can be explained reasonably.


Quote
Why? Because ALL religions are merely opinions, and mine is no better than yours, and yours is no better than mine. Antagonizing each other only furthers anger, hate and aggression.

Fluffy, but the point is, those who are angered are angered because they want to contend. If I don't wish to contend, I don't read these threads. Those who read them and get angry want to contend and play the game of the war of worldviews.

We're a species that warred to be here. The universe is at war. Our bodies are at war. Right now animals are beating each other up for alpha position. Animals compete for survival. We pay money to watch alpha males fight in an octagon. We war over ideas so the strongest survive. It's evolution. We crave growth through forms of aggression. But I will say, I'm happy we're not debating over these ideas with swords and fire wood.


Quote
People will believe what they want to believe, however, stating that someone is dumb, or stupid, or ignorant because of whatever God they believe in, doesn't do anyone any good.

If someone is ready to find another path, they will, but they won't be forced into it by anyone else.

That's not always the case. Many people are won over by fiery debate. I, recently, won over a friend with my fiery arguments, and he's now an atheist. While some may prefer the soft styles, others are won with blunt and hard honest arguments.

As iron sharpens iron so man sharpens another, said the inventor of Solomon. And we evolve in ways that aren't always pretty. We grow by sparking against others and environment.


Quote
You once considered yourself a Christian, now you do not. Did someone force you to change your mind, or did you come about it by yourself?

It was a combination of other people's arguments and my own critical thinking in relation, as it is with many others.

Quote
Why must you force your opinion onto others?

No one is being forced. I'm on an internet forum typing words. Tying people to a stake and saying believe or burn, now, that's forcing!

Quote
Why do you antagonize those who don't believe as you do?

Fluffy, even if I come with sincere kindness, these arguments will be interpreted on here as aggressive. It is what it is.

It's a forum to discuss and debate and no one has to read these threads. Those who read them and get worked up want to be worked up. They lust to contend for various reasons. Only the lusting heart can be filled with the fires of aggression or sexuality.

I think people owe it to themselves to discover reality and drop beliefs that promote homophobia, child abuse, and self guilt, etc. So, I'll bring forth arguments. Some have thanked me later for helping them out of a faith that had them blinded in ignorance.



« Last Edit: July 28, 2012, 02:02:27 AM by Xerxes »
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #26 on: July 25, 2012, 10:24:10 AM »

Maybe you two that assert humans evolved from non-living material billions of years ago with nothing but a foolish dismissal of the obvious have some mature insults for this creationist who had your God-less evolution hogwash(called a LIE) shoved down his throat at Princeton University in 1941?

Keep them coming; you're just like children who simply refuse to obey instruction.  Maybe Xerxes has some cut and paste research on how Princeton wasn't educationally equipped/qualified to teach about evolution in the 1940's; and so, sadly, this creation evangelist with a doctorate from an accredited university(which is supposed to satisfy Forsythia, but won't!) fell through the cracks of government's attempt to manufacture a godless society of dependent slaves to Communism - where government provides all - and therefore is "god".

It's only 2 minutes and 50 seconds if you can endure it; I've met him personally, and have completed one of his courses...but again...I seemingly follow after 8 years-old's who speak in kindergarten language and teach fairy tales that I can understand...

A few logical fallacies in here, as is typical for Less.

Anyone else want to point out the faulty logic of this post?


It must be really frustrating to not have any valid argument.

Less, provide that source for the polystrate whales. That's the only half-argument you've brought this week. I want to research it.

You know what... I'll research it myself and post the scientific rebuttal.
Logged

MonroeMonkey

  • Guest
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #27 on: July 25, 2012, 10:41:36 AM »

OK, Less. Head over to the evolution thread. Your whale of a claim has been rebutted by scientists.
Logged

LessGovernment

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1261
  • "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom"
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #28 on: July 25, 2012, 11:08:12 AM »

did you cut and paste - or - did you, and those you are appealing to contact those who discovered the whales and refute their conclusions in an open forum?
Logged
"Wherefore governments rather depend upon men than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be ever so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn." - William Penn

Forsythia

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1986
Re: Use and Abuse of Logic
« Reply #29 on: July 25, 2012, 11:12:51 AM »

did you cut and paste - or - did you, and those you are appealing to contact those who discovered the whales and refute their conclusions in an open forum?

OK so you can cut and paste but no one else can.  What are the rules for debating you exactly?
Logged
For those who have problems with my posts, please feel free to fill out the form at the link below and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGF4UVJ5UmpZLUhzX0dMNEotSEljTXc6MQ


Ignorance is only blissful for the ignorant.  The rest of us have to put up with you idiots.

"Prayer is nothing more than bargain basement anger." A. LaVey


"A christian telling an atheist he is going to hell is about as scary as a small child telling an adult they won't get any presents from santa." - R. Gervais
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Up