MonroeTalks.com > Categories > Politics and Government > Who for Sheriff?


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Who for Sheriff?  (Read 3728 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Baby Hitler

  • Guest
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #60 on: August 01, 2012, 01:39:51 PM »

I REALLY hope that Jan Jay gets elected.
Logged

Collegekid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14863
  • Doing the impossible makes us mighty.
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #61 on: August 01, 2012, 01:51:07 PM »

I don't think that you can plan on how to solve a cold case Deanna. Cold Cases require a lot of time and resources, but most importantly a bit of luck to crack.

As resources are cut, cold cases being solved will lessen down to a near zero level.
Logged
http://daveherndon.blogspot.com/

You believe in life after death, I believe in death after life

I swear it upon Zeus; an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler.

- Socrates


Non Illegitimati Carborundum

"Most men stop when they begin to tire. Good men go until they think they are going to collapse. But the very best know the mind tires before the body and push themselves further and further, beyond all limits. Only when these limits are shattered can the unattainable be reached."

Deanna

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1305
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #62 on: August 01, 2012, 09:55:36 PM »

I don't think that you can plan on how to solve a cold case Deanna. Cold Cases require a lot of time and resources, but most importantly a bit of luck to crack.

As resources are cut, cold cases being solved will lessen down to a near zero level.
Collegekid, absolutely without manpower it would be difficult- maybe Monroe needs to get some forensic college students involved...supply the crime and the resources and let them put in the time and investigate it?
Provide me with some free training, resources, point me in a direction and I could put in several hours a week at least, on my  dime.  I would like to think that I am not the only one that would.  Dang I would think some of the folks at the senior centers would be able to help out if they were asked even. 
Logged
I'd rather be by myself than in bad company

sammy

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #63 on: August 01, 2012, 10:01:56 PM »

Collegekid, absolutely without manpower it would be difficult- maybe Monroe needs to get some forensic college students involved...supply the crime and the resources and let them put in the time and investigate it?
Provide me with some free training, resources, point me in a direction and I could put in several hours a week at least, on my  dime.  I would like to think that I am not the only one that would.  Dang I would think some of the folks at the senior centers would be able to help out if they were asked even. 
Yep, we need the seniors to step up and solve all those cold cases that the cops can't solve! Did you read what you posted before you posted it?
Logged

eriemermaid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13251
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #64 on: August 01, 2012, 10:33:11 PM »

LOL This place makes me smile!  I love Monroe and the Monroe Evening News. :)
Logged

Collegekid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14863
  • Doing the impossible makes us mighty.
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #65 on: August 02, 2012, 12:05:26 AM »

Collegekid, absolutely without manpower it would be difficult- maybe Monroe needs to get some forensic college students involved...supply the crime and the resources and let them put in the time and investigate it?
Provide me with some free training, resources, point me in a direction and I could put in several hours a week at least, on my  dime.  I would like to think that I am not the only one that would.  Dang I would think some of the folks at the senior centers would be able to help out if they were asked even. 

That's an idea that only works in a perfect world. First off untrained people, even given the equipment could not do that type of work.

Secondly, even if you got college students and gave them interns, many interns actually cause more work for supervisors. It's rare to get an intern that you don't have to supervise at least at double the rate you would a regular employee. Plus with interns you lose them roughly every 15 weeks, and they generally work 15 hours or less per week.

Not to mention that unions would never allow either of those things to happen.

So yeah, in a perfect world where the laymen is perfectly trained, no union interference in free labor (not bashing unions here.) and where interns work like full time employees, you might crack one or two cold cases a year.

Personally I wouldn't base who I'm voting on because of their plan to deal with cold cases. It makes no difference in "policing" on a day to day level.
Logged
http://daveherndon.blogspot.com/

You believe in life after death, I believe in death after life

I swear it upon Zeus; an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler.

- Socrates


Non Illegitimati Carborundum

"Most men stop when they begin to tire. Good men go until they think they are going to collapse. But the very best know the mind tires before the body and push themselves further and further, beyond all limits. Only when these limits are shattered can the unattainable be reached."

T-M-T

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3951
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #66 on: August 02, 2012, 07:16:27 AM »

That's an idea that only works in a perfect world. First off untrained people, even given the equipment could not do that type of work.

Secondly, even if you got college students and gave them interns, many interns actually cause more work for supervisors. It's rare to get an intern that you don't have to supervise at least at double the rate you would a regular employee. Plus with interns you lose them roughly every 15 weeks, and they generally work 15 hours or less per week.

Not to mention that unions would never allow either of those things to happen.

So yeah, in a perfect world where the laymen is perfectly trained, no union interference in free labor (not bashing unions here.) and where interns work like full time employees, you might crack one or two cold cases a year.


Good points.

I’m also sure a defense attorney would love to hear that amateurs worked on the case against his/her client.

Simply being obsessed with missing people won’t do much for you in the Voir Dire process.
Logged

Frenchfry

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 27290
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #67 on: August 02, 2012, 08:23:43 AM »

Well it appears at least one candidate is promising the moon with his plan to add 5 more Deputies, add 3 more narcotic k-9 units and create his own drug division.

Now consider that OMNI was Multi-jurisdictional...comprised of various departments....I doubt the funding was shouldered entirely by Monroe County.

Don't fall for the fear tactic being promoted by these anti-drug zealots....Monroe County has NOT been overtaken with drugs....and building up such a narrow focused militarized force would be a huge waste of resources that could be better utilized elsewhere.

Interesting tidbit, the government can seize and sell property of people not judged guilty of any crime.

Yep, Asset Forfeiture is legal theft.

For the record, I personally abhor drugs but the drug war has been a failure for everyone except the private prison industry.
Logged
WARNING! Reading Republican/Conservative/Tea Party comments will lower your intelligence quotient!

The new motto of the obstructionist Republican Party/Conservative-right/Tea Party...refuse to legislate, just investigate.

jbs49238

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5201
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #68 on: August 02, 2012, 08:45:32 AM »

LOL!!!  The War on Drugs is a travesty because of the way it is carried out NOT because drugs are not a problem.

Users need treatment and rehabilitation, dealers NEED to go to jail. 

The reason LE cannot get affectively into the places it needs to (IMO) is that they cannot turn a blind eye to a violation of the law (kinda like when they don't just give you a ride home for driving drunk) and there is SO MUCH at street level and so many are addicted and carrying small amounts it has created SO MANY LEVELS of insulation between what LE can access and the real movers of the product.

LE needs better tools to cut through to the producers and wholesale level suppliers.  You are right when you say the current war is a failure, but you are right for the wrong reasons.
Logged

Frenchfry

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 27290
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #69 on: August 02, 2012, 09:25:31 AM »

LOL!!!  The War on Drugs is a travesty because of the way it is carried out NOT because drugs are not a problem.

Users need treatment and rehabilitation, dealers NEED to go to jail. 

The reason LE cannot get affectively into the places it needs to (IMO) is that they cannot turn a blind eye to a violation of the law (kinda like when they don't just give you a ride home for driving drunk) and there is SO MUCH at street level and so many are addicted and carrying small amounts it has created SO MANY LEVELS of insulation between what LE can access and the real movers of the product.

LE needs better tools to cut through to the producers and wholesale level suppliers.  You are right when you say the current war is a failure, but you are right for the wrong reasons.
Well let's look beyond your impulse to find something to disagree about and ask specifically, what "reasons" are you disagreeing with?

Please explain how you know so much about street level drug use.

I personally feel too many low level users that are put through the ringer unnecessarily and the prison system is bulging with those non-violent offenders.

The sale and seizure of property without being convicted is commonplace.

To reiterate, a narrow-focused militarized drug team would be a waste of money.

Have to go. I'll revisit when I can.
Logged
WARNING! Reading Republican/Conservative/Tea Party comments will lower your intelligence quotient!

The new motto of the obstructionist Republican Party/Conservative-right/Tea Party...refuse to legislate, just investigate.

Professor H

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6929
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #70 on: August 02, 2012, 10:35:55 AM »

I agree with Fry ...   
Shocking I'm sure to many  ;D

JBS also is correct that the LE efforts are unable or unwilling to follow the $$ to the top, and too many low level people are put in the system because of this policy.   Apparently they only do that in the movies  ;)

 
Logged
First, it was not a strip bar, it was an erotic club. And second, what can I say? I'm a night owl.
Marion Berry

But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.
Nancy Pelosi

Pax

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5199
  • "keepin' the bits cool & dry"
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #71 on: August 02, 2012, 11:01:37 AM »

     
     With all the gum-flapping and literature from your "candidates" regarding their personal Wars on Drugs! I ask, again, what any of them plan to do to deter your federal government from supplying and transporting said "illegal" substances into and around the county?  The morons on the bottom of that particular food-chain are the usual targets but the big drug-runners are ignored as being untouchable.  wth?  If your "sheriff" is going to "enforce laws" certainly going after the biggest drug dealer in the world operating within his supposed "jurisdiction" should be a larger priority than the stoner with a roach or two in his pocket:

Head of DEA Says He Intercepted CIA Cocaine Shipments<- link
Did Mexican Official Blow Lid Off CIA-Managed Drug Trade?<- link
Logged
Qui tacet consentit! - "He who is silent consents" - Maxim of Law
"For he who would be deceived, let him." - Roman maxim
"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it; and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them." -Pope St. Felix III

eriemermaid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13251
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #72 on: August 02, 2012, 11:34:24 AM »

Oh my!  I agree with Frenchfry also!  See what happens when you SAY something instead of just the copy and paste?   ;)
Logged

Collegekid

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14863
  • Doing the impossible makes us mighty.
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #73 on: August 02, 2012, 01:43:46 PM »

Much of the reason I have very much enjoyed this thread Erie.
Logged
http://daveherndon.blogspot.com/

You believe in life after death, I believe in death after life

I swear it upon Zeus; an outstanding runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler.

- Socrates


Non Illegitimati Carborundum

"Most men stop when they begin to tire. Good men go until they think they are going to collapse. But the very best know the mind tires before the body and push themselves further and further, beyond all limits. Only when these limits are shattered can the unattainable be reached."

Deanna

  • Hero Talker
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1305
Re: Who for Sheriff?
« Reply #74 on: August 03, 2012, 11:52:11 AM »

Yep, we need the seniors to step up and solve all those cold cases that the cops can't solve! Did you read what you posted before you posted it?
lol it sounded right in my head, but going back and rereading it sounds off for sure.  I was trying to imply that their may be some jobs that could be offered for senior volunteers and free up some officers to get them on the streets where they can do more good. 
T-M-T- I am not suggesting taking jobs away from law enforcement by no means-they have had too many cuts already in my opinion. I am suggesting volunteers to work with them.   

I also wouldn't expect anyone to base their vote primarily on cold cases either, nor would I expect them to base their votes primarily on the drug issues.

"Simply being obsessed with missing people won’t do much for you in the Voir Dire process"
And what does juror selection have to do with volunteeers gathering information?  I also am not sure why it is that when people are bringing attention to missing persons cases it's an obsession but when people rant and rave and carry on about numerous other topics, obsession doesn't get mentioned.   
Logged
I'd rather be by myself than in bad company
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6   Go Up