Try proving your assertion for a change.
Compare Fermi 2 to Fukishima.
Same reactors - almost built at the same time at the same place.
Now compare the design of the cooling systems, the containment building, how many redundant systems are around the reactor.
Totally different. Fermi 2 has redundant backups on redundant backups. Fukishima did not.
Perhaps someone who works at Fermi would like to elaborate - but I believe there are two concrete / steel containment buildings between the steel reactor housing and the outside at Fermi. It sure looked like Fukishima was just built inside a pole barn. I am pretty sure Fermi 2 would have withstood the tsunami and safely shutdown when it lost its connection to the grid.
That is just one "minor" difference.
How is that for "proving" my assertions?
Maddow is a hack "journalist" who is just out to push a political agenda. Hence she does not report all of the truth.