Print

[tampachicken]

You missed the point of my post. Hillary was also known to check into motel rooms with Vince Foster. She seems to be sexually active with both sexes. She may be as sexually active as Bill but Bill and Hillary are not sexually active with each other. That strongly suggests that their marriage is all about political power and nothing else which is the point of this blog. Of course, as long as they are still married they cannot testify against each other.
Tammy Bruce is a lesbian and I could easily vote for her if she was running for office. What I am against is the nanny state.
The history channel just broasdcast "the last stand of the 300". The Spartans were pure statists. Everything people in Sparta did was for the state. They lived and died for the state. That is why they were warriors. Statists have to be warriors because they produce little on their own. Trader states and countries are the producers. Statists have to rob traders in order to get what they want.

Actually Bob.. I got your point... This is why I responded to your point... You obviously have some sort of preoccupation with the sex lives of other people.. and have some sort of thing with homosexuals that are in government positions.. Just because people are Gay, Straight, bisexual, transgendered or Lesbian does not have anything to do with their ability to do their job.. I really find it disturbing that you care so much about these things. 

What on earth does it have to do with how our government is run?  Does sexuality and wha people do behind closed doors really matter?  Maybe I am just wired a little different.. but from reading some of the other post.. I don't think I am among the minority... You know Bob, we all have these stereotype images of people.. I fear white republican males the most.  Some things that I hear really scare me.. I know you are a sincere person and mean well, but some of your statements are exactly why I fear people like you.. and you are running for public office?  How about someone that works for you or lets say you do get eleced and find out that your pesonal assistent is Gay... Would you get rid of them Bob???  This is my point... you make it sound like wha someone does in "their" sex life.. has something to do with their abiliy to perform their job.. So does it have an effect???

See this is my issue when people start throwing around what "other" people do in the privacy of their homes. lives and relationships.  Then you have the politicians that keep playing the "homo" card to stir up the evangelicals... Fear and scare tactics... full of a lot of half-truths, and sometimes just outright malicious intent.

I am really trying not to be sarcastic, but it is so hard for me.  See the truth is very funny... ha ha funny!!! I just can't help but think.. Why would anyone care.. or be surprised that Janet Reno may or may not be a lesbian.. Did it have an effect on her ability to make decisions?? 

Again, I am so thankful that the younger generations are not holding on to the same ideas as your or even my own generation may still hold onto.  Maybe sometime when I am in Monroe.. or if you find yourself near Tampa or Joplin Missouri we can sit down and have a cup of coffee together.. 

Drop me a line.... The Chicken...

[Farmer.Ted]

Here Here Tampa!

Right on!

[Bob Beadles]

Actually Bob.. I got your point... This is why I responded to your point... You obviously have some sort of preoccupation with the sex lives of other people.. and have some sort of thing with homosexuals that are in government positions.. Just because people are Gay, Straight, bisexual, transgendered or Lesbian does not have anything to do with their ability to do their job.. I really find it disturbing that you care so much about these things. 

What on earth does it have to do with how our government is run?  Does sexuality and wha people do behind closed doors really matter?  Maybe I am just wired a little different.. but from reading some of the other post.. I don't think I am among the minority... You know Bob, we all have these stereotype images of people.. I fear white republican males the most.  Some things that I hear really scare me.. I know you are a sincere person and mean well, but some of your statements are exactly why I fear people like you.. and you are running for public office?  How about someone that works for you or lets say you do get eleced and find out that your pesonal assistent is Gay... Would you get rid of them Bob???  This is my point... you make it sound like wha someone does in "their" sex life.. has something to do with their abiliy to perform their job.. So does it have an effect???

See this is my issue when people start throwing around what "other" people do in the privacy of their homes. lives and relationships.  Then you have the politicians that keep playing the "homo" card to stir up the evangelicals... Fear and scare tactics... full of a lot of half-truths, and sometimes just outright malicious intent.

I am really trying not to be sarcastic, but it is so hard for me.  See the truth is very funny... ha ha funny!!! I just can't help but think.. Why would anyone care.. or be surprised that Janet Reno may or may not be a lesbian.. Did it have an effect on her ability to make decisions?? 

Again, I am so thankful that the younger generations are not holding on to the same ideas as your or even my own generation may still hold onto.  Maybe sometime when I am in Monroe.. or if you find yourself near Tampa or Joplin Missouri we can sit down and have a cup of coffee together.. 

Drop me a line.... The Chicken...

The sex lives of politicians are important only insofar as it reflects on what kind of people they are. That two people would keep a marriage of convenience in place solely because of their lust for power says something significant about them. That suggests that Hillary is ruthless in her persuit of power.  It is Hillary's Marxist/Stalinist philosophy coupled with her ruthlessness that makes her so dangerous. Barrack Obama has the same political philosophy as Hillary but no one knows if he is ruthless or not. John McCain is not much better but he is not a Marxist.
Jimmy Carter was a very upright individual but he was a lousy president.
John F. Kennedy was an excellent president and he was as sexually active with women other than his wife as Bill Clinton. The big difference was that JFK dated movie stars. There was also much more decorum in the Kennedy white house. The anything goes style of the Clinton white house is what was so tasteless. Some things should be done in private.

[sue lee]

The sex lives of politicians are important only insofar as it reflects on what kind of people they are. That two people would keep a marriage of convenience in place solely because of their lust for power says something significant about them. That suggests that Hillary is ruthless in her persuit of power.  It is Hillary's Marxist/Stalinist philosophy coupled with her ruthlessness that makes her so dangerous. Barrack Obama has the same political philosophy as Hillary but no one knows if he is ruthless or not. John McCain is not much better but he is not a Marxist.
Jimmy Carter was a very upright individual but he was a lousy president.
John F. Kennedy was an excellent president and he was as sexually active with women other than his wife as Bill Clinton. The big difference was that JFK dated movie stars. There was also much more decorum in the Kennedy white house. The anything goes style of the Clinton white house is what was so tasteless. Some things should be done in private.

Things were done in private, people could not keeps their mouths shut! And how does being gay matter? Condi has lived with the same women for decades, who cares? So what do we imagine Bush's sex life consists of? He is the worse president ever? I don't care, why should anyone care? Stay the hell out of others bedrooms.

[the nosh]

Things were done in private, people could not keeps their mouths shut! And how does being gay matter? Condi has lived with the same women for decades, who cares? So what do we imagine Bush's sex life consists of? He is the worse president ever? I don't care, why should anyone care? Stay the hell out of others bedrooms.

wow soo lee...bob has been in your bedroom?? 

[tampachicken]

The sex lives of politicians are important only insofar as it reflects on what kind of people they are. That two people would keep a marriage of convenience in place solely because of their lust for power says something significant about them. That suggests that Hillary is ruthless in her persuit of power.  It is Hillary's Marxist/Stalinist philosophy coupled with her ruthlessness that makes her so dangerous. Barrack Obama has the same political philosophy as Hillary but no one knows if he is ruthless or not. John McCain is not much better but he is not a Marxist.
Jimmy Carter was a very upright individual but he was a lousy president.
John F. Kennedy was an excellent president and he was as sexually active with women other than his wife as Bill Clinton. The big difference was that JFK dated movie stars. There was also much more decorum in the Kennedy white house. The anything goes style of the Clinton white house is what was so tasteless. Some things should be done in private.

Hi Bob, sounds like you are changing your stance a wee bit... which is great..  If the sex lives only reflects what kind of person they are... well what kind of person is Janet Reno, or Chalala... You seemed to need to mention that these women were lesbian..and somehow this had something to do with the topic.. This I believe was "after" you reported that people were afraid to use the bathrooms at the white house becuse of all the "gay sex". Were these two of the homosexuals having sex in the white house bathrooms???..don't answer that.. I know that they were not... again my "humor" coming out...

You seem to observe and judge what other people are, how do you do that?  I mean  you have gone around the bend on Hillary, from her being a lesbian, then going into a motel room, now being a marxist?  Hollary is ruthless...have you been watching the white house in the past seven years...

Back again to Janet Reno... Sex lives reflect what kind of person they are...and since you were the one that threw in the lesbian "tell all"... how does Janet Reno's sex life reflect what kind of person she is... what kind of person is she exactly??   Please tell us... I truly am interested...

One other thing... please tell me the little expose' that you did regarding the sex lives of the former presidents was intended to be your hand at humor... I mean did you read what you wrote... Kennedy was a excellent president because he dated movie stars, and although Clinton was/is "as" sexually active he was not???  This is different because...there was tasteless sex going on??? I say this because you are conflicting your statements... So if Clinton would have had a tetatua.. with a movie star.. there would be no problem?

[sue lee]

wow soo lee...bob has been in your bedroom?? 

Never Noshie, Bob is a bit too uptight for me!

[Coffee.Mom]

Hillary’s “putting up with Bill’s infidelity” DOES  challenge her credibility, and here’s why:

Hillary paints herself as some strong, liberated woman . . . what a joke. The only reason she got where she is today is because she was married to a powerful man. She put up with a lot of crap from him because he was a means to her end . . . election to high office. And someone like her is championed by leaders of the women’s movement? You’ve  got to be kidding . .

The primary reason I would not vote for Hillary, however, has nothing to do with her female gender,  nor  her tolerance of Bill’s escapades. The main reason I wouldn’t vote for her is because of her extremely liberal political views and proposals, which I believe would be disastrous for the country.

That being said, what a weak, twisted, corrupt individual she must be to think she had to stick  by someone like Bill Clinton in order to achieve her political ambitions.  Yeah, being Mrs. Bill Clinton really qualifies her to be president, all right.

[Griff]

Hillary paints herself as some strong, liberated woman . . . what a joke. The only reason she got where she is today is because she was married to a powerful man.

If I may, a liitle diversion on the power in this marriage:

Bill and Hillary were visiting Bill's home in Hope, Arkansas. They needed fuel and stopped at a service station were the attendant became very conversational with Hillary.

As the Clinton's were leaving, Bill said, "who was that?"

Hillary: "An old flame I almost married."

Bill: "Strange how things work out. You married the most powerful man on earth, a man that was President of the United States. You could have easily married a gas station attendant."

Hillary: " You have it all wrong dear. If he and I married, YOU would have been the gas station attendant and he would have been President."

peace,
Griff

[the nosh]

Never Noshie, Bob is a bit too uptight for me!

LOL!!

[numberone]

Single mom was not suggesting that it all be aired in the open, she was just suggesting that Hillary is weak and not a good candidate to advance women in our society.  Hillary is weak, proven by the fact that she stays with a man that has waked all over her....time and time and time again.  Sure, it may be their own business.  But since it is out and everyone knows it, how can she be seen as a strong woman.

I think by staying with Bill Hillary showed a lot of determination and strength.  It would take a weak person to walk away from a long term marriage and just give up on the relationship.  The strong women would fight for her man and stand beside him and forgive.  The person who forgives is definitely the bigger person than the one who tries to drag a person through the mud. 

And if those who think Hillary just stayed married to Bill to help her in the run for president, why couldn't a strong woman who is divorced be president?  Heck, some of the churches even allow divorced preachers to stay in the pulpit so why not let a divorced woman stay in the White House? 

Our personal morals shouldn't dictate who we vote for but the candidate's views on the economy, terroism, and the war in Iraq would be more beneficial to consider

The conservatives got their way when Bush stole the White House in 2004.  They got their godly man in there and look where he has taken us.  So much for morals!!

[zard0z]

And if those who think Hillary just stayed married to Bill to help her in the run for president, why couldn't a strong woman who is divorced be president?

...I would say she has much more political clout being married to an ex-president than divorced from one...Kind of makes sense, now doesn't it...?   Strong woman or not, she has more power to wield and far more supporters staying with him...

The conservatives got their way when Bush stole the White House in 2004.

That's just too funny, are you still in the frame of mind that Bush "stole" the election...?  What happens if the Republicans win again?  Are you going to cry foul because your side didn't win...?

[tampachicken]

...I would say she has much more political clout being married to an ex-president than divorced from one...Kind of makes sense, now doesn't it...?   Strong woman or not, she has more power to wield and far more supporters staying with him...


That's just too funny, are you still in the frame of mind that Bush "stole" the election...?  What happens if the Republicans win again?  Are you going to cry foul because your side didn't win...?

Zard... as for the repubblicans... A lot of that depends on how the election goes... maybe they won't run out of ballots at the nest election is heavily democratic precincts.. I am saying the republicans did this.. not at all.  This is just an example of how the vote was in Ohio... Remember??? See the turnout was too great, and there were not enough ballots... How does that happen anyway.. 

The real crime happened in 2000.. and I won't beat that drum.. Just a Florida voter.. that's all!!!

[Bob Beadles]

Hi Bob, sounds like you are changing your stance a wee bit... which is great..  If the sex lives only reflects what kind of person they are... well what kind of person is Janet Reno, or Chalala... You seemed to need to mention that these women were lesbian..and somehow this had something to do with the topic.. This I believe was "after" you reported that people were afraid to use the bathrooms at the white house becuse of all the "gay sex". Were these two of the homosexuals having sex in the white house bathrooms???..don't answer that.. I know that they were not... again my "humor" coming out...

You seem to observe and judge what other people are, how do you do that?  I mean  you have gone around the bend on Hillary, from her being a lesbian, then going into a motel room, now being a marxist?  Hollary is ruthless...have you been watching the white house in the past seven years...

Back again to Janet Reno... Sex lives reflect what kind of person they are...and since you were the one that threw in the lesbian "tell all"... how does Janet Reno's sex life reflect what kind of person she is... what kind of person is she exactly??   Please tell us... I truly am interested...

One other thing... please tell me the little expose' that you did regarding the sex lives of the former presidents was intended to be your hand at humor... I mean did you read what you wrote... Kennedy was a excellent president because he dated movie stars, and although Clinton was/is "as" sexually active he was not???  This is different because...there was tasteless sex going on??? I say this because you are conflicting your statements... So if Clinton would have had a tetatua.. with a movie star.. there would be no problem?

It seems that Hillary probably had a lot to do with the appointment of Reno and Shalala. That was why I mentioned them.
I believe that Kennedy was good because he did not believe in an ever expanding government.
A guest on the Mark Scott show said that Janet Reno was attractive as a young woman but that being a stumbling drunk for 30 years had ruined her looks. The Clinton's needed a corrupt attorney general in order to run a corrupt administration. Being corrupt has nothing to do with the fact that she was a lesbian. Hillary probably looked at that as a bonus.
George washington said "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." What Washington meant is that when government gets out of control it destroys it destroys lives, property and prosperity. Government has has been out of control in the United States for a long time. What I want to see is a government that is truly under the control of the citizens of this country. That would be a much smaller and less intrusive government than the one we have now.
The Clinton administration was the first to wage war on U.S. citizens at Waco, Texas and on a smaller scale at Ruby Ridge.
Bringing in information about the Clinton's sex lives was in order to show that they have a marriage of convenience. According to Michael Kellett, blond pubic hairs were found on Vince Foster's dead body. That suggests Hillary may have been there when he died.
Every person who has written a book on the Clinton's has written about their sex lives. I mentioned some of that information in order to make the same point that many authors have made about the Clinton's. They worship at the altar of political power.

[tampachicken]

It seems that Hillary probably had a lot to do with the appointment of Reno and Shalala. That was why I mentioned them.
I believe that Kennedy was good because he did not believe in an ever expanding government.
A guest on the Mark Scott show said that Janet Reno was attractive as a young woman but that being a stumbling drunk for 30 years had ruined her looks. The Clinton's needed a corrupt attorney general in order to run a corrupt administration. Being corrupt has nothing to do with the fact that she was a lesbian. Hillary probably looked at that as a bonus.
George washington said "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." What Washington meant is that when government gets out of control it destroys it destroys lives, property and prosperity. Government has has been out of control in the United States for a long time. What I want to see is a government that is truly under the control of the citizens of this country. That would be a much smaller and less intrusive government than the one we have now.
The Clinton administration was the first to wage war on U.S. citizens at Waco, Texas and on a smaller scale at Ruby Ridge.
Bringing in information about the Clinton's sex lives was in order to show that they have a marriage of convenience. According to Michael Kellett, blond pubic hairs were found on Vince Foster's dead body. That suggests Hillary may have been there when he died.
Every person who has written a book on the Clinton's has written about their sex lives. I mentioned some of that information in order to make the same point that many authors have made about the Clinton's. They worship at the altar of political power.

Wow...you blow me away Bob.... Good luck... !!!!!