Quote from: Kazimer on Today at 11:41:20 AM
Just because the Calif S. Crt rendered this queer decision allowing gay/lesbian couples to marry doesnt make it right. It is similar to putting a dress and lipstick on a pig and calling it a super model . . . doesnt change the fact that it's still a pig.
Huh? I'm not following your analogy. Are you talking about monroedude?
First, I am not talking about monroedude. I do agree with him that marriage is between a man and a woman...though I didn't put it in as crass of terms as he did with his last comment.
Second, my analogy points to the essence of the subject matter. To put it in today's vernacular...it is what it is ..and it ain't what it ain't.
Meaning : The Cal. S. Ct. can "legalize" gay/lesbian unions and call it a marriage ( put a dress / lipstick on a pig and call it a super model)...it doesn't change the "essence" that it is not right ( it's still a pig).
I hope this makes my earlier post clearer.