Again you lie. I've answered you many times, and not once did my answers penetrate the gulag of your stunted mind.
I'll make you a deal, make this very simple for you so that you can prove I am a liar. I am going to post the questions below in bold print. All you have to do is come along and copy and paste in the quotes from this thread where you answered the question. Real simple just show me your answers to my very specific questions then you can call me a liar. When your response to a question is a diatribe about how the question is presumptive you have not answered the question. If it makes you feel more comfortable I am going to provide some canned answers which you can scratch and replace with your own if you finally decide to answer.
Here goes:
Q:
Why do you feel as a US citizen you should be exempt from the results of our election process, citing only that you refuse to participate?A: Because I don't like the way government represents my opinions, so I feel since I don't like the decisions I shouldn't have to pay taxes or be subject to those decisions, even though I participate in activities or use services daily that would not be available to me had those decisions not been made or funded by taxes collected for the purpose. In other words I want to play but not pay.
Q:
What country does it better? A: None, but by admitting that I would have no leg for my argument to stand on. I'll continue to evade this question by saying it is filled with presumption.
Q:
Why have you not sought refuge there?A:Since the answer to the last question is none, but I cannot admit it, I also have to fight more embedded presumption here and evade this question as well. So... I will say that you are practicing love it or leave it even though I hate it and would love nothing more than for a anarchian society to pop up which reflects my personal utopia.
Bonus question:
Q: How do you feel right now?
A: A little winded and my feet are sore, let me get these tap dancing shoes off and slip into some sneakers.
One of us is proceeding from the premise that all human interaction must be voluntary, and one of us presumes that at least some violent force is required for human interaction.
Take one guess which of those is you.
Drop dead.
.
Your "drop dead" proved his point of who is promoting violent force and thuggery.
Open your eyes. It's a wish, not a threat. You ought to pay better attention: not once has jbs claimed that I'm promoting violence and thuggery.
His "point", that is, the premise upon which he bases his actions, is that might makes right. You can see that, can't you?
Geez duck, open your eyes man!
ML simply proves the hypocrisy of his position with that statement. ML would love it if I dropped dead, he even said it was a wish, but to keep with his "philosophy" he of course would never come and do it himself. On the other hand if someone were to take his matters into their own hands he would be perfectly OK with it, you see his vote is for me to drop dead, but since he would never physically participate in that process, he gets to rest easy knowing he was not personally responsible for any bad act that would happen to me. The reality is that he cannot hide the evil intent of his heart, that is something that I or you cannot help him with. Wishing someone would drop dead shows a complete disregard for decency. ML I would never wish you to drop dead, why would you do that to me? Thinking you can take a moral high ground because of a refusal to participate in something, even though you would like to see it happen, does not make you any less immoral. PS Karma is a *****!
Matt I really don't see why you are going off on me. I was not attacking you. Might makes right seems to come from your side more than his. But, if you want to believe it the other way I don't care.
Great insight duck.
What ML is after is for no one to have the right to regulate his life through the creation of laws passed by elected officials (anarchy). What he fails to see is that without those laws in place the entire world would be run on a might makes right basis. The strongest thugs would become the rulers then we would all live in a situation where we would have no say in how we are governed. For whatever reason, ML seems to think that if anarchy were to prevail everyone would sit around the campfire singing CUMBYA (sp who cares). What he fails to see, but already demonstrated by his wish for me to drop dead, is the human nature of man to be greedy and violent, and the inability of his philosophy to control it.
Of course ML also believes that the simple act of saying good morning to someone who does not want to hear it is a violent interaction because one person uses force to make the other hear the words. In a nutshell his philosophy is whack!